The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
an Amerind village hungry, if that village had a supply of food. And
“the hungry Indian,” says Powell, “had but to ask to receive, and this
no matter how small the supply or how dark the future prospect. It was
not only his privilege to ask, it was his right to demand.”
The Amerind distribution of food was based on long custom, on tribal
laws; food was regarded like air and water, as a necessity that should
in distress be without money and without price. Hospitality was a
law, and was everywhere observed faithfully till intercourse with the
methods of our race demolished it. Among isolated tribes it is still
observed. Among the Mokis a hungry man of any colour is cheerfully fed.
[Illustration: TLINKIT MAN AND WOMAN, 30 YEARS AGO, OR ABOUT 1870
“The labret, a small cylinder of silver with a broad head, is the
modern style of lip ornament, differing materially from the large
ones worn until a few years ago.”—Niblack
Many tribes wore lip, nose, and ear ornaments
]
We cannot seriously condemn the Amerind for not jumping at the
opportunity to tie himself to the plough, or to the ledger, or the
grindstone. He was, as a rule, close to Nature, and like all men who
live thus he imbibed some of her grandeur. He lived in independence;
and when he died, he died as the sun sets at evening, expiring in
glory, without a tear, without lamentations. In the hands of the enemy
at the stake, his passing away was sublime, like the summer cloud that
sails steadily out into the infinite blue and dissolves. The most
painful tortures failed to bring a moan to his lips, or a tear to his
defiant eye, and his proud spirit departed in silence. An offer of
liberty was frequently refused. Charnay tells of a Tlaxcaltec chief, of
great fame as a warrior, who was captured and who, on being recognised,
was offered his freedom. He refused to accept it and desired to be
devoted to the gods, as was the custom. He was tied to the gladiatorial
stone, where he killed eight warriors and wounded twenty others before
being overpowered and offered up to the war-god.
The habit of mind and body of dense commercial populations tends toward
degeneration because it is a concentration in one line. The Western
mountaineer exhibits the effect of removal from trade considerations
in a repose of manner and a tranquillity of nerves which strongly
suggest the Amerind. “There are incommensurable differences,” says
Balzac, “between the man who mingles with others and him who dwells
with Nature. Once captured, Toussaint Louverture died without uttering
a word, while Napoleon on his rock chattered like a magpie.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account