The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
In our literature many Amerind myths and legends have become firmly
implanted, and they are now as much a part of it as the tale of
Orpheus, or of Theseus, or of Hercules. Some of them have been
beautified by the diction of our poets, and Longfellow’s rendering of
_Hiawatha_ is admired the world over. This is good literature, but it
is not good ethnology, because in it an Iroquois hero-god is placed
in a setting of Algonquin legends, but this was not Longfellow’s
mistake, but Schoolcraft’s, on whose work Longfellow based his poem.
Jeremiah Curtin says: “Schoolcraft, with his amazing propensity to
make mistakes, with his remarkable genius for missing the truth and
confusing everything with which he came in contact, gave the name
Hiawatha to his patchwork.... In the face of all this Schoolcraft
makes Hiawatha, who is peculiarly Iroquois, the leading personage in
his Algonkin conglomerate: Hiawatha being an Iroquois character of
Central New York (he is connected more particularly with the region
about Schenectady), while the actions to which Schoolcraft relates
him pertain to the Algonkin Chippewas near Lake Superior. It is as if
Europeans at some future age were to have placed before them a great
epic narrative of French heroic adventure in which Prince Bismarck
would appear as the chief and central Gallic figure in the glory and
triumph of France.”[355]
[Illustration: RUSHING EAGLE, 1872
Second chief of the Mandans and son of Four Bears, Catlin’s great
friend
]
[Illustration: FINE CLOTH PRESERVED BY COPPER BEADS]
But Hiawatha, nevertheless, is incorporated in our language and our
literature, and altogether the conquered race, as was inevitable, has
left an impress on our character, on our language, on our geography,
and on our literature which can never, even if desired, be effaced. The
mark of our contact with the red man is upon us indelibly and forever.
George Bancroft is not quite right when he says, “The memorials of
their former existence are found only in the names of the rivers and
the mountains.” These memorials have not only permeated our poetry and
literature generally, but they are perpetuated in our daily food, and
every mention of “succotash,” of “mush,” of “chocolate,” is a tribute
to their existence, while the fragrance of the “tobacco” we smoke is
incense to their memory. Mrs. Sigourney touched this subject prettily
in the little poem entitled _Indian Names_:
“Ye say they all have passed away,
That noble race and brave,
That their light canoes have vanished
From off the crested wave;
That mid the forests where they roamed
There rings no hunter’s shout,
But their name is on your waters,
Ye may not wash it out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account