The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
then was: a group of families forming a gens or clan, two gentes being
represented in each family; the “father must belong to one gens and
the mother and her children to another,” descent being commonly in
the female line, and marriage within a gens being forbidden; a group
of gentes formed the phratry, and a group of phratries formed the
tribe, while a group of tribes formed the confederacy, probably the
highest form of government the Amerinds reached. The phratry as an
organisation was often absent, and the tribe was then composed of the
gentes without any further grouping. Powell seems to use “phratry” in
a different sense from Morgan and some other writers. Morgan described
a phratry as a group of gentes, whereas Powell defines it as simply
a brotherhood or society. Each gens governed itself so far as its
internal affairs were concerned; that is, it had home rule, just as
we have it to-day in our towns, counties, etc. It sent delegates
to the council of the tribe to represent it, and it elected its own
officers. There was sometimes no tribal or head chief. I never could
learn of any among the Navajos, and the Iroquois had none. When, as was
frequent, there was a sachem, or tribal chief, he was chosen or elected
by the chiefs of the various clans or gentes forming the council,
but in some tribes he inherited the office, or at least the right to
hold it. I understood this to be the case among the Kaivavits Utes of
southern Utah. A gens had the right to take into its ranks any alien
it chose to. Such a person was then a member of that gens and partook
of all the benefits or disadvantages, as the case might be. He was a
son or brother or husband, or the corresponding relationships if a
woman, and on all occasions was treated as if he had been born into the
gens or clan instead of adopted into it. He was therefore eligible for
all offices in the tribe, and white men in this way sometimes became
chiefs. Beckwourth,[370] who, however, was really supposed by a Crow
woman to be her long-lost son, became head chief of the Crows, and held
the office with distinction for a number of years. He began by being
fifth councillor. “In the Crow nation there are six councillors, and by
them the nation is ruled. There are also two head chiefs, who sit with
the council whenever it is in session. The office of first councillor
is the highest in the nation next to the head chiefs, whose authority
is equal. If in any of these divisions, when a matter is brought to
the vote, the suffrages are equal, one of the old pipemen is summoned
before the council and the subject under discussion is stated to him,
with the substance of the arguments advanced on both sides; after
hearing this he gives his casting vote, and the question is finally
settled.”[371]
[Illustration: PLENTY-HORSES, A CHEYENNE
Photographed by J. K. Hillers, U. S. Geological Survey
]
[Illustration: NORTH-WEST COAST BASKETRY HATS
Made of grass and spruce roots
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account