The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
The Iroquois confederacy was planned by Hiawatha through Däganowédä
as an interpreter of his ideas and wishes. Some, Horatio Hale for
one, think that Hiawatha was a real person, and others that it
was Däganowédä who did the work under the guise of representing
Hiawatha.[379] However this may be, the organisation of the several
tribes into the confederacy was a work of genius, and this was one
of the highest governments that was discovered on this continent. We
cannot say, however, that it was _the_ highest that ever existed, next
to that of the Aztecs or the other Central Amerinds, for we really
do not know what there may have been before, not only in Mexico and
Central America, but in the Mississippi valley or even in the State
of New York. As noted in a previous chapter, if the Iroquois had
disappeared before our arrival, we could have gained no conception
of their remarkable government from any remains that we would have
found. The Mississippi valley and the South-west, as well as Mexico and
Central America, exhibit traces of tribes who may easily have arrived
at a governmental development equal to, if, indeed, not superior to,
that of the Aztecs or the Iroquois. These tribes were undoubtedly
Amerind, but there is nothing to prove that earlier Amerind tribes were
inferior in their political development to later ones.
The misconceptions of the Spaniards due to ignorance of Amerind
organisation gave false colouring to the Aztec confederacy; and the
flowing diction of Prescott, gemmed with terms and titles applicable
to Old-World society, but having no place in that of the New, added to
the confusion. Pages relating to “nobles,” “princes,” “royal allies,”
“sovereigns,” “lords,” etc., do not help in fathoming the intricacies
of Amerind government. Had the Spaniards met with the Iroquois we
should have had something similar in their case; and the fact that they
had no head chief would not have been discovered by the conquistadores,
so eager for other prey. One of the war-chiefs would again have been
taken for a royal personage, and the sachems and councillors would
have been nobles and princes, while the outlying tribes of the Five
Nations would have filled the bill for royal allies. It is likely
that the Aztec government was in advance of that of the Iroquois,
but that there was any royalty about it must be doubted till better
evidence is available. On the other hand, Morgan’s attempt to prove
that the Aztec organisation was not beyond that of the Pueblos or the
Iroquois is to be taken with caution. Brinton says: “The government
of these states did not differ in principle from that of the northern
tribes, though its development had reached a later stage. Descent was
generally reckoned in the male line, and the male children of the
deceased were regarded as the natural heirs both to his property and
his dignities. Where the latter, however, belonged rather to the gens
than the individual, a form of election was held, the children of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account