The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
How the Amerinds came here I explain by a theory that there was before,
or perhaps during the early part of the glacial period, a wider
distribution of land surfaces on latitudinal lines, which invited
latitudinal migrations.[1] These land surfaces may have been no more
than groups of larger or smaller islands which have been since wholly
submerged or have left only their highest parts above the sea. Before
the beginning of the glacial cold, a mild climate extended to the North
Pole, facilitating migrations also in that region. Changes in the
ocean’s bottom were probably greater in pre-glacial time than now, but
they have not altogether ceased. It is little more than fifteen years
since a new island appeared off the Aleutian chain, and I think it is
doubtful if any of that group existed above water six or eight hundred
years ago. I am also of the opinion that no human life was in Alaska or
in Northeast Siberia five hundred years back.
Races not being all of an even grade of culture before the beginning
of the cold period any more than now, the tribes that found themselves
isolated on this continent by changes in the land levels and by the
southward extension of the glaciation, were unevenly developed, some
being in advance of others in various ways, though none, of course,
had passed beyond the use of stone tools, a condition in which they
practically continued down to the Discovery. In this respect the term,
“Stone Age,” as indicating a condition, is applicable, but it would
not be possible to differentiate it into “Paleolithic” and “Neolithic”
periods. The cold pushed them all southward, whether they came by
northlands or by latitudinal lands, or both, towards the narrow
funnel-like part of the continent, and also to the lower levels,
as there was no chance for latitudinal expansion as in the Eastern
Hemisphere, the most advanced tribes being the most southerly, if not
from original position, because they were able to choose. Eventually
communication with Asia and Europe by the north was by the glaciation
severed completely, as it had previously been latitudinally by the
disappearance of favourable land surfaces, and communication by the
north remained closed till within three or four hundred years. The most
crowded tribes developed most rapidly, because such development was
imperative for self-preservation, and their culture filtered through
in diminishing ratio, according to distance, to the less crowded
regions—that is, to the climatically less favourable regions; but all
who were closely crowded into the “funnel” progressed along similar
lines and in much the same degree, _without regard to relationships_,
so that we find in the narrow part of the continent, where the
largest number found refuge from the cold, many different stocks in
almost parallel stages of culture. There were no isolated “areas of
characterisation” as in the latitudinally broader lands of the Eastern
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account