The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
Maya decline. “A difference, it is true,” says Thomas,[70] “in the
forms and ornamentation, and, to a certain degree, an advance toward
a more perfect type, can be traced, but no examples, so far as the
writer is aware, of the first rude beginnings or the original forms
have been found. Some comparatively rude are found painted on pottery,
scratched on shells or other soft material, but these belong to what
may be termed demotic writing and are not primitive forms. Comparing
the characters of the various inscriptions which have been discovered
and those found in the few remaining pre-Columbian manuscripts, the
result is as follows: _First_, it is apparent that the characters in
the manuscripts have been adapted from those of the inscriptions. In
other words, inscriptions preceded the manuscripts; hence we must look
to the former for the older forms. What appear to the writer to be the
oldest forms of the glyphs yet discovered are seen in those of Palenque
and some of the inscriptions found by Charnay at Menche (Lorillard
City), though others discovered by him at this same place belong to
the later and more ornamental type, discovered in the Peten region,
that is those carved in wood discovered by Bernouilli at Tikal, a type
also found at Copan and Chichen Itza, but in none of the inscriptions
at Palenque.” For my part, I cannot see that Thomas has exactly proved
that the manuscripts were later than the stone-carved inscriptions, but
his knowledge of the subject is so great and his methods so cautious
that I am glad to give his statement in this connection.
[Illustration: FEMALE HEAD IN TRACHYTE
From slope north of Temple 22—Copan.
]
The Maya glyphs probably developed out of something like the Mexican or
Aztec writing; and the step was not a very long one from writing of the
character of the Lenapé _Walam Olum_ to that of the Aztec, and again
it was not a long step from the ordinary picture-writing to the _Walam
Olum_, so that it would seem that in these various writings we have
an interesting series of steps from the crudest attempts at records,
nearly, if not quite, to the highest, for it must be borne in mind that
the step from the Maya glyphs to a true phonetic alphabet would be even
shorter than any of the others. It is not impossible that something
of the kind may yet be discovered. While the Mayas had made little
progress in mechanical inventions, their progress in architecture,
art, writing, and in astronomy is a proof that they were a thinking
people, and, had conditions continued favourable to their progress, the
Spaniards would have found them not easy to vanquish. The prominent
and striking quality of the calculiform style has had a tendency to
obscure the point that there may have been another system in vogue,
more simple, more modern, in short purely phonetic. Perfected phonetic
characters are simple characters and are likely not to attract notice,
especially when attention has been fixed on other forms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account