The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
A series of dots readily carries to eighty-four, and then the
substitution of a line like a bow-string gives eighty-five [symbol].
The next step at ninety would be to double this bow-string, but this
seems not to have been done, as I can find no example of it. But I do
find a differentiation in another way, probably because in this figure
doubling the string would be clumsy. The difference is made by a rider
on the string, and there are two kinds of rider, one a point or
triangle, and the other a double square. Taking one of these riders for
ninety, and then the dots beside it, we find ourselves at ninety-four
[symbol]. Then with the other rider on the string for ninety-five we
arrive by means of the dots at ninety-nine [symbol]. Then comes a
demand for a character for one hundred, and this appears to have been
merely a circle. A dot beside it would give 101, and so on by adding,
out or in, the various symbols 199 is reached. To get to 299 it is only
necessary to add another circle. For 500 some other symbol must be
adopted, and the apparent one is a sort of circle with a kind of scarf
knot at the top, or perhaps it can be described as a knotted scarf,
[symbol]. Taking this as 500 we can easily arrive [symbol] at 599.
An extra circle within will then carry to [symbol] 699, and so on by
adding circles up to 1000. Thomas in one of his admirable discussions
of Maya writing[76] is puzzled by what he terms ornamental loops around
some of the numerals, but if the line I have indicated here has any
sense in it these ornamental loops would be 602, 604, etc., or some
other numbers depending on the proper place for this symbol in the
general scheme. The series of “loops” mentioned by Thomas is this:
[Illustration]
Something might be determined by a comparison of these symbols with the
known names of numbers. The Mayas counted into the millions, so they
must have had a perfected system.
[Illustration: A SUGGESTION OF THE POSSIBLE SCHEME OF MAYA NUMERALS.
WHOLLY TENTATIVE
Founded on figures in the codices and on tablets
From drawing by the author
]
[Illustration OMAHA CALUMET]
[Illustration: OMAHA WAR CLUB]
CHAPTER V
BASKETRY AND POTTERY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account