Butler, Samuel, 1835-1902 -- Notebooks, sketchbooks, etc.
I shall be told that Raffaelle did come to draw and paint much better
than he has done here. I demur to this. He did a little better; he just
took so much pains as to prevent him from going down-hill headlong, and,
with practice, he gained facility, but he was never very good, either as
a draughtsman or as a painter. His reputation, indeed, rests mainly on
his supposed exquisitely pure and tender feeling. His colour is
admittedly inferior, his handling is not highly praised by any one, his
drawing has been much praised, but it is of a penmanship freehand kind
which is particularly apt to take people in. Of course he could draw in
some ways, no one giving all his time to art and living in Raffaelle’s
surroundings could, with even ordinary pains, help becoming a facile
draughtsman, but it is the expression and sentiment of his pictures which
are supposed to be so ineffable and to make him the prince of painters.
I do not think this reputation will be maintained much longer. I can see
no ineffable expression in the Ansidei Madonna’s head, nor yet in that of
the Garvagh Madonna in our gallery, nor in the S. Catharine. He has the
saint-touch, as some painters have the tree-touch and others the
water-touch. I remember the time when I used to think I saw religious
feeling in these last two pictures, but each time I see them I wonder
more and more how I can have been taken in by them. I hear people admire
the head of S. Nicholas in the Ansidei picture. I can see nothing in it
beyond the power of a very ordinary painter, and nothing that a painter
of more than very ordinary power would be satisfied with. When I look at
the head of Bellini’s Doge, Loredano Loredani, I can see defects, as
every one can see defects in every picture, but the more I see it the
more I marvel at it, and the more profoundly I respect the painter. With
Raffaelle I find exactly the reverse; I am carried away at first, as I
was when a young man by Mendelssohn’s _Songs Without Words_, only to be
very angry with myself presently on finding that I could have believed
even for a short time in something that has no real hold upon me. I know
the S. Catharine in our gallery has been said by some not to be by
Raffaelle. No one will doubt its genuineness who compares the drawing,
painting and feeling of S. Catharine’s eyes and nose with those of the S.
John in the Ansidei picture. The doubts have only been raised owing to
the fact that the picture, being hung on a level with the eye, is so
easily seen to be bad that people think Raffaelle cannot have painted it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account