Butler, Samuel, 1835-1902 -- Notebooks, sketchbooks, etc.
There is nothing for it but a very humble hope that from the Great
Unknown Source our daily insight and daily strength may be given us with
our daily bread. And what is this but Christianity, whether we believe
that Jesus Christ rose from the dead or not? So that Christianity is
like a man’s soul—he who finds may lose it and he who loses may find it.
If, then, a man may be a Christian while believing himself hostile to all
that some consider most essential in Christianity, may he not also be a
free-thinker (in the common use of the word) while believing himself
hostile to free-thought?
XXIII
Death
Fore-knowledge of Death
No one thinks he will escape death, so there is no disappointment and, as
long as we know neither the when nor the how, the mere fact that we shall
one day have to go does not much affect us; we do not care, even though
we know vaguely that we have not long to live. The serious trouble
begins when death becomes definite in time and shape. It is in precise
fore-knowledge, rather than in sin, that the sting of death is to be
found; and such fore-knowledge is generally withheld; though, strangely
enough, many would have it if they could.
Continued Identity
I do not doubt that a person who will grow out of me as I now am, but of
whom I know nothing now and in whom therefore I can take none but the
vaguest interest, will one day undergo so sudden and complete a change
that his friends must notice it and call him dead; but as I have no
definite ideas concerning this person, not knowing whether he will be a
man of 59 or 79 or any age between these two, so this person will, I am
sure, have forgotten the very existence of me as I am at this present
moment. If it is said that no matter how wide a difference of condition
may exist between myself now and myself at the moment of death, or how
complete the forgetfulness of connection on either side may be, yet the
fact of the one’s having grown out of the other by an infinite series of
gradations makes the second personally identical with the first, then I
say that the difference between the corpse and the till recently living
body is not great enough, either in respect of material change or of want
of memory concerning the earlier existence, to bar personal identity and
prevent us from seeing the corpse as alive and a continuation of the man
from whom it was developed, though having tastes and other
characteristics very different from those it had while it was a man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account