The Notorious Impostor (1692); Diego Redivivus (1692)Settle, Elkanah
General
The Notorious Impostor (1692); Diego Redivivus (1692)
Settle, Elkanah
Morrell, William, -1692 -- Fiction
The importance of the Morrell narratives in the development of English
fiction lies mainly in their deft combinations of the real and the
picaresque and in their conscious effort to unify the action, draw out
the humour, or handle realistic talk and setting. But the narratives
also look backward to an older type, the picaresque. William Morrell
makes his printed appearance as the new picaro. The title _Diego
Redivivus_ (i.e. James Revived) had overtones of the sensationally
picaresque. The witty pseudonym "Don Diego Puede-Ser" had been used by
James Mabbe in his translation (1623) of Aleman's _Vita del Picaro
Guzman_;[7] and more recent in English memories were the exploits of
James Hind, the English Rogue. In the Dedication, _The Notorious
Impostor_ describes itself as "_the Life of our English_ Guzman" and
later promises to "paint our new _Guzman_ in some of his boldest and
fairest Colours." But the picaresque traditions have shaded into one
another. For Morrell is not simply the new Guzman; he is also Hudibras
and, in _The Second Part_, Don Quixote.
Still another reason for the importance of the Morrell narratives is
their consciousness of fictional techniques and theory. In _Diego
Redivivus_, for example, the final deception is meticulously developed
with closely-woven incidents which do not appear elsewhere. The motives
of the characters, too, are sharply defined; and the action is unified
by the two references to oath-taking (pp. 2-3). The anonymous author,
at the outset, stresses the value of "the Particulars ... no
disacceptable Entertainment" (p. 1). Aware of theory, he specifies that
Morrell created "some Romantick narrative" to explain his poverty (p.
4). In fictional technique, Elkanah Settle approaches a unified theme
especially in _The Second Part of the Notorious Impostor_ and the
"Comical Adventures" of _The Compleat Memoirs_ where the incidents are
mainly of one kind--matrimonial. Theorizing appears, too, in Part One
somewhat in the manner of Daniel Defoe: "we dare not venture to play
the Historian any farther than certain Intelligence (which yet we have
not received) can guide us, being resolved not to load our Rambles with
Romance or Fiction, his Life being furnisht with matter sufficiently
voluminous without the addition of Flourish or Fancy" (p. 27). This may
be Settle's pointed reference to the "fiction" of _Diego Redivivus_.[8]
He maintains, also, that he had to delay for a fortnight the
publication of _The Second Part of the Notorious Impostor_ in order to
be certain of its authenticity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account