The Numerical Strength of the Confederate Army: An examination of the argument of the Hon. Charles Francis Adams and othersMcKim, Randolph H. (Randolph Harrison)
History
The Numerical Strength of the Confederate Army: An examination of the argument of the Hon. Charles Francis Adams and others
McKim, Randolph H. (Randolph Harrison)
Confederate States of America. Army
[2] Our critic has made an error here: 12 per cent, of 1,000,000, i.e.,
120,000, so that his aggregate should be 1,420,000.
[3] See Merivale's History of the Romans, III, 416, and IV, 298 and 343,
and V. 386.
[4] In the first edition of Col. Henderson's work, cited above, he
actually stated that the element of foreigners in the Southern armies
was almost as large as in the Northern armies!
[5] Gen. Marcus J. Wright puts this number at only 65,387. But cf.
Mansfield's Life of Grant, p. 338.
[6] See a valuable discussion of our subject in a pamphlet entitled
"Acts of the Republican Party," by Cazenove G. Lee, who wrote under the
_nom de plume_ of "C. Gardner," Winchester, Va., 1906, pp. 59-69.
[7] I acted as adjutant of the Third Brigade A. N. Va., in the
Gettysburg campaign. Even then, in the third year of the war, and in
that best equipped army, the returns showed only 1480 muskets to 1941
men in the brigade. One-fourth of the command was without arms.
[8] "The Government, at the opening of 1864, estimated that the
Conscription would place four hundred thousand men in the field." Lee
did not share this belief. By the end of the year it was, in his
opinion, "diminishing, rather than increasing, the strength of his
army."--Letter of Dec. 31, 1864. See "R. E. Lee, Man and Soldier," p.
591, by Thos. Nelson Page.
[9] Thus, to quote that able and expert authority Gen. Marcus J. Wright:
Battles around Richmond (1862), Lee, 80,835; McClellan, 115,249. At
Antietam, Confederates, 35,255; Federals, 87,164. At Fredericksburg,
Confederates, 78,110; Federals, 110,000. At Chancellorsville,
Confederates, 57,212; Federals, 131,661. At Gettysburg, Confederates,
64,000; Federals, 95,000. At the Wilderness, Confederates, 63,981;
Federals, 141,160.
[10] A consideration of the portentous difference between the number of
men borne on the regimental rolls and the number actually available on
the battlefield, suggests that it may be in large degree accounted for
by the number of men detailed for service in the industrial army.
Thus in the army of Northern Virginia just before Fredericksburg, Nov.
20, 1862:
Aggregate present and absent 153,773
Aggregate present for duty 86,569
Soon after Gettysburg:
1863: Present and absent 109,915
Present for duty 50,184
Before Wilderness campaign:
1864: Present and absent 98,246
Present for duty 62,925
On reaching Petersburg, July 10, 1864:
Present and absent 135,805
Present for duty 68,844
As to exemptions it was customary to exempt farmers who engaged to raise
a certain amount of corn.
Again the practice was extensively pursued of granting furloughs for
recruiting service. Such men continued to be borne on the rolls of their
commands in the field.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account