The nutrition of manChittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Science
The nutrition of man
Chittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Nutrition
The experiment, however, that came as a death blow to the theories of
Liebig was that of Fick and Wislicenus,[43] who in 1865 made an ascent
of the Faulhorn, 6500 feet high, using a diet wholly non-nitrogenous.
From the nitrogen excreted they were able, of course, to calculate the
amount of proteid oxidized in the body during the period of work, and
found that the proteid consumed could not have furnished, at the most,
more than one-half the energy required to lift the weights of their
bodies to the top of the high peak. Further, they observed that neither
during the work period, nor immediately after, was there any noticeable
increase in the excretion of nitrogen. Obviously, as they state, the
oxidation of proteid matter in the body cannot be the exclusive source
of the energy of muscular contraction, since the measurable amount
of external work performed in the ascent of the mountain was far
greater than the equivalent of the energy capable of being furnished
by the proteid actually burned. To which may be added the fact that
considerable energy, not measurable in their experiment, must have
been employed in the work of the involuntary muscles of the body; thus
increasing by so much the difference between the muscular work actually
accomplished and the available energy from proteid consumed. It is true
that minor criticisms regarding certain details of the experiment can
be offered to-day, such as the fact that the men were, in a measure,
in a state of “nitrogen starvation,” etc., but these criticisms do
not in any degree militate against the main thesis that the energy of
muscular contraction does not come exclusively from the consumption or
breaking down of proteid, either of food or tissue. Vigorous and even
severe muscular work does not necessarily increase the decomposition
of proteid material. Dogs made to run in large treadmills, with the
same diet as on resting days, were found to excrete practically no
more nitrogen than during the days of rest. Occasionally, however,
in some one experiment the output of nitrogen would show an increase
over the output on resting days. Further, experiments made with horses
led to essentially the same result, except that greater increase in
the excretion of nitrogen was observed than with dogs. This increase
in nitrogen output, however, as a concomitant of increased muscular
activity, could be prevented by adding to the amount of carbohydrate
food.
[43] See Gesammelte Schriften von Adolf Fick. Ueber die Entstehung
der Muskelkraft. Band 2, p. 85. Würzburg, 1903.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account