The nutrition of manChittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Science
The nutrition of man
Chittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Nutrition
What is the nature of the material used up in connection with muscle
work? As can readily be seen, this is an important question, for on its
answer depends, in some measure at least, the character of the proper
intake, or food, to be supplied in order to make good the loss. If the
energy of mechanical work, the energy of muscle contraction, comes from
the breaking down of proteid matter alone, then obviously excessive
muscular work would need to be accompanied, or followed, by a generous
supply of proteid food. If, on the other hand, external work means
liberation of energy solely from non-nitrogenous materials, then it
is equally clear that fats and carbohydrates are the proper foods to
offset the drain incidental to vigorous muscular action.
The views of Liebig, briefly referred to in a previous chapter, held
sway over physiologists for many years. His dictum that proteid foods
were true plastic foods, entering into the structure of the tissues
of the body, and that they alone were the real sources of muscular
energy, met for a time with no opposition. It was not until the advent
of a more critical spirit, accompanied by a fuller appreciation of
the necessity of experimental evidence, that physiologists began to
test with scientific accuracy the validity of the current views. It
is worthy of note that long prior to this time, even before oxygen
was discovered, the far-sighted and resourceful John Mayow, in his
work with the various “spirits” of the body and their relation to
respiration, etc., evolved the view that muscular power has its origin
in the combustion of fat brought to the muscles by the blood and burned
there by aid of a gas or “spirit” taken from the air by the lungs, and
likewise carried to the muscles by the circulating blood. Considering
the time when Mayow lived and the dearth of true scientific knowledge
as we measure it to-day, his hypothesis was a wonderful forestalling of
present views.
It is quite obvious that the views of Liebig, if true, admit of easy
proof; since, if the energy of muscular power comes from the breaking
down of proteid, there should be a certain parallelism between the
output of nitrogen from the body and the amount of muscular work
accomplished, everything else being equal. As stated in a previous
chapter, such study of this question as was made soon disclosed the
fact that the one element above all others that seemed to influence the
output of nitrogen was the intake of proteid food. Thus, the English
investigators, Lawes and Gilbert, found by experimenting with animals
that when the latter were kept under uniform conditions of muscular
work, the amount of nitrogen excreted ran parallel with the intake
of nitrogen. Further, in the early experiments of Voit, the results
obtained clearly showed that variations in the amount of work performed
were practically without influence on the excretion of nitrogenous
waste products.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account