The nutrition of manChittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Science
The nutrition of man
Chittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Nutrition
The entire floor under the dogs was composed of metal, the
joints all soldered, the floor being sloped to a metal gutter in front
so that all the compartments could be flushed out each morning and kept
sweet and clean. In pleasant weather, immediately after their first
meal, the dogs were taken out of doors to a large enclosure near by,
where they were allowed perfect freedom until about four o’clock, when
they were taken in for their second meal (between four and five o’clock
in the afternoon). The outdoor enclosure was inaccessible to every one
except the holder of the key, and the dogs while there were wholly free
from annoyance. Once every month, during a period of ten consecutive
days, each dog was confined in the metabolism cage so as to admit of
the collection of all excreta, in order to make a determination of
the nitrogen balance. Practically, therefore, each dog was in close
confinement only one-third of the month, the remaining two-thirds
being spent in much more congenial surroundings. I have entered thus
fully into a description of the conditions prevailing, because I deem
them exceedingly important, and because therein undoubtedly lies the
explanation of the striking contrast between our results and those of
the earlier investigators of this subject.
In considering the outcome of our experiments, it may be wise to enter
into some detail concerning the first case to be presented. The animal
employed in this experiment was designated as No. 5, and weighed on
July 27, 1905, 17.2 kilograms; it was apparently full grown, but was
thin and had the appearance of being underfed. At first, it was given
daily 172 grams of meat, 124 grams of cracker dust, and 72 grams of
lard, the day’s ration containing 8.66 grams of nitrogen and having a
fuel value of 1389 calories.[72] These figures are equivalent to 80
calories, and 0.50 gram of nitrogen, per kilogram of body-weight. The
animal took kindly to the diet, but on August 3 it refused to eat and
seemed to have a little fever. The next day it was better, but for
the three following days its appetite was poor, and only a portion
of the daily food was eaten. Body-weight began to fall off, and was
soon at 15.5 kilograms. On the 7th of August, a dose of vermifuge
was given, after which the appetite returned and the animal appeared
in good spirits. From this time forward it seemed in perfect health,
with good appetite, and showed the usual vivacity and playfulness of
dog-kind. The diet as specified was continued unchanged until August
25, a balance experiment covering a period of ten days, from the 15th
to the 24th of August inclusive, being carried out, in which the
nitrogen of the intake was compared with the output for each day. From
the accompanying table, where are given the average values of all the
balance periods of the experiment, it is to be seen that during this
first period the animal was laying on or gaining an average of 2 grams
of nitrogen per day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account