In the county of Suffolk are two liberties, one of St. Edmund Bury, and the other of St. Ethelred of Ely: suppose a _capias_ comes at the suit of _A._ to the sheriff of Suffolk, to arrest the body of _B._ the sheriff makes a mandate to the bailiff of the liberty of St. Ethelred, who makes no answer; in that case the plaintiff shall have a writ of _non omittas_, and by force thereof he may arrest the defendant within the liberty of Bury, although no default was in him [_sci._ in the bailiff of that liberty.] _5 Rep._ 92. But this is to be understood of the process of the Kings Bench; for Common Pleas recites the _capias_, the sheriffs return, that he has made his mandate to the bailiff, who has given no answer, and then gives the sheriff power to enter the liberty; but in the Kings Bench, on the sheriffs return on the _Latitat_, the authority is general, _non omittas propter aliquam libertatem_, which gives the sheriff power to enter not only that liberty, but all the liberties within the county: And this seems to be grounded on the words of the _latitat_, (viz.) _latitat_ and _discurrit_, so that the defendant is supposed to skulk and run from one place to another; and therefore the _non omittas_ was made general, that he might not run from one liberty to another. _Gilb. Hist. C. P._ 24.[26] [Sidenote: Justice of peace.] A warrant of a justice of peace to arrest for felony may be executed in a franchise within the county, for it is the Kings suit, in which a _non omittas_ is virtually included. _2 Hale P. C._ 116.[27] [Sidenote: Process.] By _5 G. 2. c. 2._ § 3., in particular franchises and jurisdictions the proper officer there shall execute such process [i. e. where cause of action in superior court is under 10l. in inferior court under 40 s.] [made perpetual by 21 G. II. c. 3.][28] [Sidenote: Sheriffs deputy.]