The Ohio Journal of Science, Vol. XVI, No. 1, November 1915Various
History
The Ohio Journal of Science, Vol. XVI, No. 1, November 1915
Various
Natural history -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
I know of no literature on the grinding of small lenses though the
following memoirs on the making of large reflecting telescopes should
be in the hands of any one interested in this work:
=On the Construction of a Five-foot Equatorial Reflecting Telescope.=
By A. A. Common, LL. D., F. R. S.
Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. L., 1890-91.
=On the Construction of a Silvered Glass Telescope,
Fifteen and a Half Inches in Aperture, and its
Use in Celestial Photography.=
By Henry Draper, M. D.,
Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Vol. 34.
=On the Modern Reflecting Telescope and the
Making and Testing of Optical Mirrors.=
By George W. Ritchey.
Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Vol. 34.
NOTE 1—A SPHEROMETER FOR SHORT RADII.
[Illustration: FIG. 6]
In Fig. 6, A is a regular Brown & Sharpe Micrometer Head with the
measuring point ground to an angle of 60° and slightly rounded; B is a
round steel base all machined at one setting in which the micrometer
head is clamped by a set screw not shown.
Let r be the radius of the spherical surface, MNO, and we will have at
once r = (a^2 + d^2) / 2d. The advantage of this form of spherometer
is that it is very easy to make the point of the micrometer exactly
central with the base and the value of 2a can be accurately determined
by means of an ordinary micrometer calliper. For a convex surface,
2a should obviously be the inside diameter of the base, B.
In using the instrument, two tables, one for concave and one for
convex surfaces, should be prepared; these tables to give the power in
dioptres for each one thousandth of an inch in the value of d. Using
the American Optical Co.’s Standard Index, namely, μ equal to 1.5000
and one dioptre as being the power of a lens of 40 inches focus, we
have, for a plano lens, p = 4/f = 40d/(a^2 + d^2) since f = r/(μ-1).
The advantage of forming the table in dioptres in place of radii
directly is that the tabular differences are small at all parts of the
table so that interpolation can be readily done and this is not the
case in tables which give the radii directly.
If upon measuring the radius of the tool or lap being turned in the
sphere turning machine, Fig. 4, with this spherometer, the tool is
found to be in error by an amount Δp this may be corrected by changing
the position of the cutting tool by an amount 20 (Δp / p^2).
NOTE 2—CROSS SECTION OF THE SPHERE TURNING REST.
[Illustration: FIG. 7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account