The Ohio naturalist, Vol. I, No. 6, April, 1901Ohio State University. Biological Club
History
The Ohio naturalist, Vol. I, No. 6, April, 1901
Ohio State University. Biological Club
Natural history -- Ohio -- Periodicals; Natural history -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
A collecting trip for water-plants usually takes one across the Bay
among the bulrushes and wild rice along Cedar Point. Here from the sides
of the boat we look down into a wilderness of strange forms through the
clear water. The curious eel-grass, with its perfect spirals,
Myriophyllum and Chara, Philotria, Utricularia, and the Potamogetons
spread out upon the surface among the lily-pads around us, are among the
most conspicuous. A few minutes collecting here is productive of results
quite out of proportion to the time spent. Many of these plants, at the
time of my visit, had lifted themselves to the surface and bore their
inflorescence above the water. Among these were some of the
Potamogetons, Utricularia, Philotria, and others. A marigold looked
strangely out of place on the surface of the water—it was the Bidens
Beckii in bloom. The American Lotus lifted its head conspicuously above
its lesser neighbors. Some minute, light-colored, fluffy masses,
floating far out in the Bay, we decided to be the pollen of the
Vallisneria.
I have said nothing of the Algae; the most of my work at the Laboratory,
however, was with these forms. Many kinds are common and many more may
be obtained by seeking for them. These types of plant life, in beauty of
form and importance of study rivaled by none, repay much time spent upon
them.
The collecting and study of only a week here—a week, too, of recreation
rather than of work—was but a suggestion of what might be done, though
one which proved quite powerful. From our landing at Cedar Point was
visible, for a long distance out, the bright pink of a Swamp Rose
Mallow. It typified the week’s work, it was a suggestion, too, of other
strangers which might be lurking behind those trees and among those
vines and undergrowth. We found that the suggestion was not a vain one,
and in following it out we were never disappointed.
DRAGONFLIES OF SANDUSKY.
JAMES S. HINE.
As the dragonflies of Sandusky have been quite carefully collected for a
number of years, it may be worth while to give the result in the form of
a list with notes on some of the species.
Calopteryx maculata and Hetaerina americana have not been taken as
commonly as in some places, for the locality does not furnish their most
desirable surroundings.
The genus Lestes is represented by unguiculatus, uncatus, disjunctus,
forcipatus, rectaugularis, vigilax, inequalis and eurinus. Nearly all of
these species are abundant and are mostly found among the grass at the
edge of the marsh.
The genus _Argia_ is represented by four species, putrida, violacea,
sedula and apicalis. The first two are very numerous in individuals.
Nehalennia posita and irene; Enallagma civile, ebrium, carunculatum,
aspersum, exsulans, geminatum, antennatum, signatum pollutum;
Amphiagrion saucium and Ischnura verticalis have all been taken, usually
near the water’s edge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account