The Ohio Naturalist, Vol. I, No. 7, May, 1901Ohio State University. Biological Club
History
The Ohio Naturalist, Vol. I, No. 7, May, 1901
Ohio State University. Biological Club
Natural history -- Ohio -- Periodicals; Natural history -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
W. A. KELLERMAN.
This charming spring flower called in popular language Rue-Anemone,
indigenous to eastern North America, has been known from early times,
and as in many other equally unfortunate cases has had imposed upon it
by botanists a superfluity of scientific names. Linnaeus in his Species
Plantarum, 1753, listed it as Anemone thalictroides; in 1803 Michaux
called it Thalictrum anemonoides; it was rechristened as Syndesmon
thalictroides in 1832 by Hoffmansegg; finally Spach in 1839 proposed the
name Anemonella thalictroides. Botanists to-day consider our plant as
more properly placed in Hoffmansegg’s genus Syndesmon, and for it the
earliest specific name, applied by Linnaeus, is very properly retained;
hence the correct designation in botanical language is Syndesmon
thalictroides (L.) Hoffmg.
The extent of variation in this plant has been but partially noted
heretofore. The tabulation given below indicates the results of
observations made the latter part of April and the first of May this
year in regard to the number of flowers and the variation in the
involucral leaves. As to whether these are sessile as given in our
Manuals, notes have appeared on previous pages of this Journal by
Messrs. Burglehaus, Wetzstein and Schaffner, cf. pp. 72, 104 and 106.
[Illustration:
Fig. 1. Diagrams showing arrangement of leaves and flowers.
]
The number of flowers is normally three and the involucral leaves two. A
diagram showing their arrangement is given at A, Fig. 1. The two leaves
are not always ternate; they may both be simple, diagrammatically shown
at B. A further variation, shown in Fig. 1 C presents one simple and one
compound leaf. At D greater complexity is indicated, there being in many
plants besides the central flower three instead of only two axillary
ones, and only one of the subtending leaves is compound. In the case
shown at E two of the three involucral leaves are compound. As shown in
F and G four leaves may contribute to form the involucre and each one
subtend a flower; in some cases two of the leaves are compound, in
others three or even all may be compound. Still other variations along
this line occur, but space forbids a fuller enumeration.
It should be stated that although the pedicels and leaves as shown in
the diagrams (Fig. 1) occupy but a small portion of the circle, as a
matter of fact the leaflets are spread and so disposed as to occupy the
entire area when viewed from above the plant, the leaflets being
equidistant from each other, or contiguous but not overlapping, and
therefore taking the most advantageous position so far as sunlight is
concerned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account