The Ohio Naturalist, vol. II, no. 2, December, 1901Ohio State University. Biological Club
History
The Ohio Naturalist, vol. II, no. 2, December, 1901
Ohio State University. Biological Club
Natural history -- Ohio -- Periodicals; Natural history -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
On May 25, 1901, Prof. Hine, while collecting in the hills at Sugar
Grove, Fairfield County, O., found a salamander under a piece of pine
log on the slope of a hill, about a hundred yards from water. It was,
for the time, put in a jar along with several individuals of
Desmognathus fusca Raf., which were taken in, or within a few feet of
the rivulets which flow down the valley. Aside from this specimen taken
on the hillside, all the specimens were found not farther than a half
dozen feet from the water. When the collections were examined in the
laboratory it was found that the single specimen just mentioned differed
in many respects from the others. This led to investigation and it was
found that it corresponded closely with the description of D. ochrophæa
Cope. Thus, the posterior portion of the mandible was edentulous; no
tubercle in canthus ocelli; belly paler than in any of D. fusca taken;
length nearly three-fourths of an inch shorter than the others; a light
bar from eye to corner of mouth; tongue free behind; parasphenoid teeth
separated behind. The specimen was kindly examined by Dr. J. Lindahl, of
the Cincinnati Society of Nat. Hist., who is acquainted with the form.
He agreed that it corresponded with the description of Cope. Whether the
characters as given above are sufficient to place the specimen under
ochrophæa is a matter hard to decide. Cope gives the range of ochrophæa
as “in the Alleghenies and their outlying spurs.” Dr. Lindahl has a
specimen from Logansport, Ind., taken November 10, 1900.
FISHES TAKEN NEAR SALEM, OHIO.
E. B. WILLIAMSON.
The present short list is published, not because of any records of
special interest, but in order that a record may be made of the fish
known certainly from the headwaters of Beaver Creek. In the case of fish
the most logical and significant way to indicate distribution is
certainly by streams, and a very small contribution to the ichthyology
of the above named stream is here presented.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account