“The sleeping subject is now lowered, and in the act of being
‘dehypnotized’ the performer slips the crank off, which is
immediately drawn in from behind, the subject and performer sharing
the applause. It is almost needless to explain that the ‘hypnotism’
is mere sham to heighten the effect and admit of an excuse to stoop
in order to fix the cranked bar.”
[Illustration: FIG. 3.—“LEVITATION” HOW THE HOOP IS PASSED OVER THE
BODY.]
So far, so good. The above method was undoubtedly the one used in Mr.
Kellar’s original presentation of the illusion. But he has since made
numerous improvements in it which have puzzled not only the public
but the conjurers as well.
III.
Kellar has been an extensive Oriental traveler. He has hob-nobbed
with Hindoo Rajahs, smoked nargilehs with the {246} turbaned Turk,
and penetrated into darkest Africa. In India he witnessed many
exhibitions of thaumaturgy. Concerning the high-caste magic, such
as hypnotic feats and experiments in apparent death, he speaks with
respect, but the magic of the strolling Fakirs he characterizes
as inferior to that of our Western conjurers, with, perhaps, the
exception of the Hindoo Basket Trick, which is a clever illusion.
When we contemplate the fact that this startling trick is always
performed in the open air, amid a circle of spectators, we must
give due credit to the histrionic ability of the native conjurers
and their powers of misdirection. Robert-Houdin and Col. Stodare
introduced this experiment to European theatre-goers, but they were
aided by all the accessories of the modern stage and the audience sat
at a respectable distance. Let us hear Kellar’s explanation of the
feat (_A Magician’s Tour_, Chicago, 1886).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account