Actors -- Fiction; England -- Fiction; Theater -- Fiction
With jealous amazement she viewed the natural ease of the other young
ladies in the crowd, and envied them their mellifluous laughter. Earlier
in the evening she had listened with awe to the conversation in the
dressing-room, and had marked how each, according to her own tale, was
usually to be seen in highly important rôles, but being sick of
“resting” had accepted a “walk-on” as a “fill-in.” From the way the
Christian names of stage celebrities flew about Mary judged them to be
well in with the _élite_ of the profession. After a few days she learnt
that it was not essential to be personally acquainted with such persons
as Julia Neilson or Marie Löhr, before speaking of them as “Julia” or
“Marie.”
These familiarities intrigued her greatly, and before the week was out
she was able to refer to H. B. Irving as “Harry” or Dion Boucicault as
“Dot” without the slightest embarrassment. Eliphalet Cardomay was the
only person never spoken of by an abbreviation. He was and remained “The
Guv’nor.”
Mr. Manning, the stage-manager, automatically became “Freddie,” not to
be confounded with Fred, which, as everyone knows, was reserved for Fred
Terry.
“Freddie” was the subject of much conversation, indeed about forty per
cent, of the entire output either started with “Freddie is a brick, you
know,” or “Freddie is a perfect beast.”
Another twenty per cent, was given over to the doings of the call-boy,
“that little devil, Sydney,” and the remaining to reminiscences of past
successes, or such remarks as:
“I feel a perfect rag to-day.”
“Have you seen the show at So-and-so?”
“My dear, he was perfectly awful!”
“There was nothing but paper in the house.”
“But I always do love Marian; she makes me cry, of course.”
“She’s such a dear off the stage.” And so forth and so on.
Harmless stuff for the most part—not, as a rule, scandalous—always and
without exception vapid and silly.
They are dear, kind-hearted, empty-headed little ladies who sail their
boats round the fringes of the lake of dramatic art. They belong to a
_genus_ of its own. They never play parts—in the main they couldn’t if
they tried—in the main they don’t want to. They are content to talk
big, to walk on and on in one “show” after another, until at last they
have walked away their good looks and disappear to an even greater
obscurity than that of the peasant or the guest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account