The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“Although it has been pronounced lawful to kindle fire on the holy day,
even where not absolutely necessary, yet it is unlawful to extinguish
fire, even though it had been kindled for the preparation of food; for
the extinguishing of fire is work, and is not at all necessary for the
dressing of food. And as fire is not to be extinguished, so neither is a
candle to be extinguished and whosoever extinguishes is to be flogged,
just as he that weaves or builds.... Fire is not to be extinguished, in
order to save property on a holy day, no more than on the Sabbath. On
the contrary, one lets it burn and goes away.” (Ibid., c. iv. 2, 4.) In
the Arbah Turim this law is laid down with still more precision.
אסור לכבות את הדליקה ביום טוב אפילו רואה את ביתו שנשרף . אסור לכבות
הבקעת בין אם מכבה מפני שחס עליה שלא תשרף בין אם מכבה שלא תתעשן הקדרה .
ודוקא כשאפשר לו להצילה מעישון בלא כבוי כגון שיסירנה מאש זה ויתננה על אש
אחר אבל אם אין לו אש אחר ואם לא יכבנה תתעשן הקדרה מותר לכבותה כדי שלא
תתעשן הקדרה ׃
“It is unlawful to extinguish fire on a holy day, even though a man
should see his house burning. It is unlawful to extinguish split wood,
either for the sake of saving it from being burned, or to keep a pot
from being smoked, that is to say, if he can keep it from being smoked
without extinguishing the fire, as by removing it from one fire to
another. But if he has not got another fire, and if the pot must be
smoked unless he extinguish it, then the extinguishing is lawful, that
the pot may not be smoked.” (Orach Chaiim, 514.) Now we put it to the
common sense of every Jew, whether in these laws there be justice,
mercy, and religion; or hardship, inconsideration, and absurdity?
No. XIV.
SEVERITY AND ARTIFICE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account