The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
The oral law says, as we saw in our last, that, on a holy day, it is
unlawful to extinguish a fire in order to save a man’s house and
property, but that it is lawful, on the same day, to do the very same
thing to keep a pot of cookery from being smoked. This sentence may
perhaps appear wise and pious to those who have got more houses than
one, or the means of procuring them; but with respect to the poor man,
who in such a case loses his all, and must see his family left without a
roof over their heads or a bed to lie on, this decision is as cruel as
it is senseless. There is, however, a tyranny more dreadful than that
which affects only the temporal condition of men. The spiritual
despotism, which burdens and fetters the conscience and enslaves the
soul, is more intolerable still. Under temporal losses a man’s mind may
be supported by a sense of religion; but when his religion, by the
multiplicity and rigour, and intricacy of its requirements, becomes his
tormentor, man is bereft of his last consolation. The religion of the
oral law appears to us to be of this character, and its enactments with
regard to the holy days will serve to justify this our opinion. We have
seen already, that it requires two days’ cessation from business, where
God requires only one, and that the general rule is, Whatsoever is
unlawful on the Sabbath, is unlawful on the holy day, with one
exception. The Scribes, however, were not content with this, they have
contrived to invent something, which, though lawful on the Sabbath, is
on these days unlawful. They say, that there is a certain class of
things, which, if not deliberately destined the day before for the use
of the holy day, are unlawful. To this class they give the name of מוקצה
_Muktzeh_, which literally signifies “separated or cut off,” but which,
for shortness’ sake and for want of a better word in English, we shall
call “_undestined_.”
ויש ביום טוב מה שאין בשבת איסור מוקצה שהמוקצה אסור ביום טוב ומותר בשבת
מפני שיום טוב קל משבת אסרו בו המוקצה שמא יבואו לזלזל בו ׃
“There is on the holy day one thing which is not found on the Sabbath,
and that is, the forbidding of the _undestined_, for the _undestined is_
unlawful on the holy day, and is lawful on the Sabbath. Because the holy
day is less sacred than the Sabbath, they forbade the _undestined_ on
that day, lest persons should be led to make light of it.” (Hilchoth
Jom. Tov. c. i. 17.)
כיצד תרנגולת העומדת לגדל ביצים ושור הצומד לחרישה ויוני שובך ופירות
העומדין לסחורה כל אלו וכיוצא בהן מוקצה הן ואסור לאכול מהן ביום טוב עד
שיכין אותה מבערב ויחשוב עליהם לאכילה ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account