The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“He that makes a pile of fire on a holy day, when he is arranging the
wood, is not to lay one piece upon another, so as to make an orderly
arrangement, for that looks as if he were building; and although it be
an accidental building it is unlawful. But either he is to scatter the
wood in confusion, or to arrange them with some variation. How so? He is
to lay one piece at the top, and another piece under it, and another
under that, until it reaches the ground.” (Hilchoth Jom. Tov. c. iv.
14.) In like manner the pot is not to be placed upon stones, or whatever
else is to support it, but is to be held up, and the support placed
under it; and so with other things. The great principle is, that some
difference is to be made between the work done on the holy day and on a
common day, and therefore in the carrying of wine, or wood, or other
things, they are not to be carried in a basket, nor as usual, but on the
shoulder or in some extraordinary way. Now, as the speculations of men
who had not much to do, or who chose to devote the powers that God had
given them to such minutiæ, these things hardly appear as harmless; but
when imposed as a burden upon the consciences of others, they are
utterly unjustifiable, and if they were found in the New Testament, they
would furnish abundant matter for Jewish wit and ridicule. They would
naturally say, what, is this the religion that the Messiah came to
teach? Had he nothing better to do than to look after the making of
fires, and the putting on of pots? But this is not the religion of Jesus
of Nazareth, nor of his apostles. There is nothing similar in the New
Testament. This is the religion, and these the laws of those who reject
him.
But this system of minute legislation has another and a worse
consequence; it leads to difficulty, and the difficulty leads to
artifice, and thus the mind, instead of being improved and benefited, is
actually corrupted by the practice of this rabbinical religion. Thus the
oral law says, that it is unlawful on a holy day to cook food for the
following day, especially to a common day, but that if any of the food
remain it is lawful. What is the consequence? Naturally that more food
is prepared than is necessary for the holy day because they know that
this may be eaten the day after. And this is no imaginary deduction of
ours, it is a case propounded most fully, and allowed by the rabbies.
ממלאה אשה קדירה בשר אף על פי שאינה צריכה אלא לחתיכה אחת . ממלא נחתום
הבית של מים אף על פי שאינו צריך אלא לקיתון אחד . ממלאה אשה תנור פת אף על
פי שאינה צריכה אלא לככר אחד שבזמן שהפת מרובה בתנור היא נאפת יפה . ומולח
אדם כמה חתיכות בשר בבת אחת אף על פי שאינו צריך אלא לחתיכה אחת וכן כל
כיוצא בזה ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account