The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“Dread seized the holy hosts, when thou didst turn the mountain over
them as a tub: they received the pure law with fear and tremor.” (D.
Levi’s Pentecost Prayers, fol. 150.) Here is a circumstance in the
giving of the law, which few readers of the Pentateuch will remember.
All will grant that to see Mount Sinai hanging over them, like a tub or
an extinguisher, was a very dreadful sight, if it really happened. But
surely every reasonable Israelite will inquire upon what evidence it
rests? In all the previous history God appears as a merciful Father,
visiting his children in their affliction, redeeming them from bondage,
and exhibiting miracle after miracle as their safety or their necessity
required; how is it, then, that He appears so suddenly in the character
of a tyrant or a destroyer, ready to drop the mighty mountain upon the
heads of his people, and cover them up for ever under the rocky mass?
Moses throws no light upon the subject. The oral law, the Talmud, must
explain the mystery.
ויתיצבו בתחתית ההר אמר ר׳ אבדימי בר חמא בר חסא מלמד שכפה עליהם הקב׳׳ה את
ההר כגיגית ואמר להם אם תקבלו את התורה מוטב ואם לאו שם תהא קבורתכם , אמר
ר׳ אחא בר יעקב מכאן מודעא רבה לאורייתא וכו׳ ׃
“And they stood at the nether part of the mountain (or beneath the
mountain). (Exod. xix. 17.) R. Avdimi, the son of Chama, the son of
Chasa, says, These words teach us that the Holy One, blessed be He,
turned the mountain over them like a tub, and said to them, If ye will
receive the law, well; but if not, there shall be your grave. R. Acha,
the son of R. Jacob, says, This is a great confession for the law.”
(Shabbath, fol. 88, 1.) From this extract it appears that the whole
foundation of the fable is a sort of pun upon the words בתחתית ההר,
“beneath the mountain,” or as the English translators rightly have it,
“at the nether port of the mountain.” R. Avdimi thought that these words
meant, as Rashi says, תחת ההר ממש, “under the mountain in the strictest
sense of the words.” But then the puzzle was, how the Israelites got
into that situation. R. Abdimi’s imagination supplied the rest. But in
the first place, the word תחתית occurs often enough in both the singular
and plural, but never has this signification. In the second place, this
fable directly contradicts the Mosaic account. God had already sent
notice to inform the people of the giving of the law, and they had
replied, “All that the Lord hath spoken we will do.” (Ver. 8.) In the
third place, if the mountain was turned over them like a tub, how did
Moses get up to the top, and what necessity was there for the command,
“Go down, charge the people, lest they break through?” &c. (Ver. 21.)
And lastly, if the law was forced upon the Israelites contrary to their
wish, cannot they make this an apology for disobedience? Is not this
what R. Acha, the son of Jacob, actually does, when he says, “This is a
great confession for the law?” So at least Rashi explains his words.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account