The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
מודעא רבה שאם יזמינם לדין למה לא קיימתא מה שקבלתם עליכם יש להם תשובה
שקבלוה באוס ׃
“A great confession, for if he call them to judgment, saying, Why have
ye not kept that which ye took upon yourselves, they have an answer,
that they were forced to receive it.” (Rashi Comment. in loc.) And this
fable, contrary to the narrative of Moses, derogatory to the mercy of
God, and subversive to the principle of human responsibility, the
rabbies have introduced into the prayers of the synagogue, and there it
still stands as an evidence of the absence of God’s Spirit from those
who rejected Jesus of Nazareth, and imposed the oral law upon Israel.
But this want of wisdom appears not only in the nature of the additions
which they have made to the Word of God, but also in the conflicting
statements which these additions contain. In the legend just given
Israel is represented as having been unwilling to receive the law, and
yet in the morning service for the first day of Pentecost, we have an
allusion to another legend, which describes the great reward bestowed
upon them, because they received it with such a ready mind.
הם קבלו עול תורה עלימו , ונעשה לנשמע הקדימו , מרם נשמע נעשה נמו , וצדקה
בה נחשבה למו , ולשני כתרים סוימו , למלוכה וכהונה וללויה אוימו ׃
“They willingly took the yoke of his law upon them, and caused the
expression, ‘We will do,’ to precede, ‘We will hearken;’ before they
heard it they said, ‘We will do,’ and which was accounted for
righteousness to them; and they were dignified with two crowns; and
rendered awful with the sovereignty of the priesthood, and the Levitical
institution.” (Pentecost Prayers, fol. 86.) At first sight it would
appear as if this were a mere figurative expression to denote either the
priesthood and the Levitical institution, or the monarchy and the
priesthood. But then a difficulty occurs, why are only two crowns
mentioned? Every one knows that in a figurative sense the oral law says
that Israel is crowned with three crowns, as it is said,
בשלש כתרים נכתרו ישראל כתר תורה וכתר כהונה וכתר מלכות ׃
“Israel is crowned with three crowns, the crown of the law, and the
crown of the priesthood, and the crown of the kingdom.” (Hilchoth Talmud
Torah, chap. iii. 1.) Why then does this prayer only mention two? It is
because it refers to a totally different circumstance. The number of the
crowns, and the reason assigned for their bestowal, “because they caused
the expression ‘We will do,’ to precede ‘We will hearken,’” both
identify the allusion as being made to the following Talmudic legend:—
בשעה שהקדימו ישראל נעשה לנשמע באו ששים ריבוא של מלאכי השרת לכל אחד ואחד
מישראל קשרו לו שני כתרים אחד כנגד נעשה ואחד כנגד נשמע וכיון שחטאו ישראל
ירדו מאה ועשרים רבוא מלאכי חבלה ופרקום שנאמר ויתנצלו בני ישראל את עדים
מהר חורב ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account