The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
The last proof, taken from Deut. v. 22, if considered in its context,
also proves the contrary. The tradition quotes only a part of the verse,
“These words the Lord spake unto all your congregations;” but if you
read on you will find, “And he added no more,” which words plainly limit
the first sentence to the ten commandments. This tradition, then, as
being contrary to Scripture, to the law of Moses, is a falsehood, and is
therefore unworthy of a place in the prayers of that people, whom God
selected from all the nations of the earth to be his witnesses, and the
depositories of his truth. But this tradition is objectionable not only
as a fable, though that is a very strong objection to any thing proposed
as an article of faith, but on account of the purpose which it was
intended to serve. It was invented for the purpose of strengthening the
spiritual tyranny of the Scribes and Pharisees over the minds of the
people. It is not therefore merely an erroneous interpretation of
Scripture, nor the dream of a fanatic imagination, but the deliberate
invention of men who knew what they were about, and had an object which
they were endeavouring to compass, and for the attainment of which they
did not stick at deliberate falsehood. They were, however, too wise to
confine all the advantages of this appearance at Sinai to themselves;
they asserted that the whole people of Israel obtained an advantage
which makes them superior to all other nations. The prayer which we have
quoted above alludes to this, when it says, “There was no blemish in
them, for they were all entirely perfect.” This sentence rather puzzles
an ordinary reader of the Bible, who thinks of the conduct and character
of Israel as there described; the Talmud, however, helps us to
understand this eulogy:—
מפני מה גוים מזוהמין שלא עמדו על הר סיני שבשעה שבא הנחש על חוה הטיל בה
זוהמא , ישראל שעמדו על הר סיני פסקה זוהמתן גוים שלא עמדו על הר סיני לא
פסקה זוהמתן , אמר ליה רב אחא בריה דובא לרב אשי גרים מאי אמר ליה אע׳׳ג
דאינהו לא הוו מזליהו הוה , דכתיב את אשר ישנו פה עמנו עומד היום לפני ה׳
אלהינו ואת אשר איננו פה וגו׳ ׃
“Why are the Gentiles defiled? Because they did not stand upon Mount
Sinai, for in the hour that the serpent came to Eve, he communicated a
defilement, which was taken away from Israel when they stood on Mount
Sinai: but the defilement of the Gentiles was not removed, as they did
not stand on Sinai. Rav Acha, the son of Rabba, said to Rav Ashai, how,
then, does it fare with proselytes? He replied, although they went not
there, their good fortune (or star) was there, as it is written, ‘With
him that standeth here with us this day, before the Lord our God, and
also with him that is not here with us this day.’ (Deut. xxix. 15.)”
(Shabbath. fol. 145, col. 2, at the bottom of the page.) The commentary
on this passage quotes still further particulars from Siphri, and says—
כל שעמדו על הר סיני נתקדשו ונטהרו , ונתרפאו מכל מום ואף עורים ופסחים
שהיו בישראל כדתניא בספרי ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account