The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“Moreover, all the chief of the priests, and the people, transgressed
very much, after _all the abominations of the heathen_, and polluted the
house of the Lord which he had hallowed in Jerusalem. And the Lord God
of their fathers sent to them by his messengers, rising up betimes and
sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his
dwelling-place: but they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his
words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose
against his people, till there was no remedy. Therefore he brought upon
them the King of the Chaldeans, who slew their young men with the sword
in the house of their sanctuary, and had no compassion upon young man or
maiden, old man or him that stooped for age: he gave them all into his
hand—and they burned the house of God and broke down the wall of
Jerusalem, and burned all the palaces thereof with fire, and destroyed
all the goodly vessels thereof.” (2 Chron. XXXVI. 14-19.) Here, then,
obstinate idolatry is represented as the cause of the first desolation.
Israel learned and practised the abominations of the heathen, and thus
polluted the temple, and therefore God destroyed the temple and sent
them into captivity. There were no doubt many and other great sins in
Israel, but they are not mentioned, as if to show that nothing short of
wilful and obstinate departure from God could have led him to adopt so
severe a measure. As long as they retained their allegiance to God and
rejected the abominations of the heathen, there was a hope and a
possibility that they might repent of other sins, but when men
obstinately turn away from God, and will not hearken to his warnings,
all hope of repentance is at an end, and there is no alternative but
just judgment. But was this the case in the second temple? Were the Jews
then obstinate idolaters? Had they images amongst them, and did they
pollute the second temple with such abominations of the heathen? No,
rather than bow down to images, they willingly endured every torture,
and offered up even their lives as a sacrifice to the truth, and when
the second temple was destroyed, there was not amongst Israel a single
vestige of idolatry. Never, in the whole course of their history, from
the going forth out of Egypt to that day, was there such an apparently
scrupulous observation of the letter of the law, and never had Israel
had so many learned men devoted to the study of the commandments. What
then could be the cause of the second desolation? It was not idolatry,
but it must have been something equally odious in the sight of God, and
it must have been a sin committed equally by the priests and the people.
You observe that in the above description of the first destruction, it
is said, “All the chief of the priests, and the people transgressed very
much.” If the priests had remained faithful to their God, He would not
have destroyed their temple, for there would have been hope, that, by
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account