The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
their exertions and teaching, the people might be brought to a better
mind. Or, if the people had remained faithful, God would not have
punished the people for the sins of the priests; he would have cut off
the wicked priests and raised up others according to his own heart.
Nothing short of the unanimous wickedness of priests and people could
have brought on so great a calamity. In like manner we infer that the
cause of the second destruction was not any partial wickedness, but some
sin, of which both priests and people were guilty, that drew down that
calamity. And, further, it must have been a sin against which they were
warned by special messengers of God. When the priests and the people
fell into idolatry, God did not immediately destroy the first temple. He
first tried whether they would listen to his warnings and repent, and
therefore “he sent to them by his messengers, rising up betimes, and
sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his
dwelling-place.” Now, surely, when we see that God showed such
compassion, when He was about to send so small a calamity as the seventy
years’ captivity, we may safely infer that he would not bring the more
tremendous judgment of eighteen hundred years’ desolation, without
exhibiting a compassion proportionate to the coming infliction. In the
former case he sent special messengers and prophets to warn them, he
must also have acted similarly before the second destruction. Who, then,
were the messengers and the prophets that warned the Jews of their sin?
The Jews say, that during the second temple there was no prophecy; but
is it possible to imagine that the God of Israel would shut up his
bowels of compassion, and pity neither his people nor his
dwelling-place, but give them both over to the most dreadful visitation
that ever descended on a nation without one word of warning? When he was
about to destroy Nineveh he first sent Jonah to call them to repentance,
and when his judgments were about to descend upon Babylon, the words of
warning were miraculously written on the wall; can we suppose, then,
that God would not have as much mercy on Jerusalem and the Jews as on
Babylon and Nineveh? The supposition is utterly inconsistent with God’s
character and dealings. There must have been prophets who announced the
coming judgment and warned the people of their sin. Who were they, then,
and what was that sin equal to idolatry which priests and people
committed and obstinately persevered in, despite of all warning, and in
which their descendants still persevere? Idolatry is a departure from
the true God, and the setting up a false system of religious worship.
Now it is granted that the Jews did not make images, but did they set up
a false system of worship and religion contrary to the religion of Moses
and the prophets? Let the oral law and the Jewish Prayer-books answer
that question. We have shown in these papers that the oral law,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account