The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
sanctioned by the Jewish Prayer-books, is directly at variance with the
written Word of God. It teaches the Jews to put trust in amulets,
charms, and magic, which are mere heathenism. It teaches a cruel and
unmerciful system for the Jews, gives false ideas of the character of
God, and actually forbids the Jews to love their Gentile brethren as
themselves. The setting up of this system was the great sin which
priests and people all joined in committing, and in which their
posterity still continue. They were warned against this sin: God sent
them extraordinary messengers, He sent them Jesus of Nazareth, the
prophet like unto Moses, and the Messiah. The great burden of his
preaching was against this false religion, the oral law, but they would
not hearken to his words. Priests and people conspired together to
reject and crucify him. Here, then, was the result of the false system
which they adopted. The oral law was the tree, the rejection of the
Messiah the fruits. But still the Lord had compassion upon his people,
and upon his dwelling-place, he spared them yet for forty years, and in
the meanwhile sent his apostles to warn them and testify against their
iniquity; “but they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his
words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose
against his people, till there was no remedy,” and he gave them into the
hands of the Romans. Because they rejected Jesus of Nazareth and his
disciples, the temple and city were desolated. The Jews have been taught
to think that Jesus and his disciples were deceivers, but let them
consider this fact, that, if they were, God himself has sealed the truth
of their assertions by the acts of His Providence. The preservation of
the temple and city to this day would have been incontestable evidence
that they were deceivers. Had no judgments followed upon the crucifixion
of Jesus, it would have been evident to all mankind, that he was not
what he pretended to be. But if he was indeed the Messiah, the strongest
possible attestation that God could give, was the exemplary punishment
of those who crucified him, and this God has given. They crucified
Jesus, and God destroyed the temple and scattered the people. Without
this, the religion of Jesus never could have triumphed as it has done.
If the temple were still standing, and the Jews in their land, they
could point to the temple and say, “See that temple, the monument of
God’s favour and presence, it is still amongst us, and shows that Jesus
could not have been the Messiah. If he had been the Messiah, God would
not have left us this unequivocal testimony of his favour.” But this
proof of their righteousness God has taken away, and that within forty
years after the crucifixion of Jesus; so that God himself has given the
strongest possible attestation to the truth of his claims. Let any
reflective Israelite calmly consider this, that, if Jesus was not what
he claimed to be, his crucifixion was the most meritorious act that the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account