The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“But if the wicked man will turn from all his sins that he hath
committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and
right, he shall surely live, he shall not die. All transgressions that
he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned to him, in his
righteousness that he hath done he shall live.” But this verse is as
strongly against the doctrine of the oral law as the others already
cited. In the first place, it does not say, that he whose sins exceed
his merits is wicked, but that he who commits sin is wicked. In the
second place, it does not say that, by causing his merits to exceed his
sins, he can become righteous, but by turning away, “from ALL his sins
that he hath committed,” and by keeping “ALL my statutes.” It confirms
the doctrine laid down already from the law of Moses, that to be
righteous in the sight of God, a man must commit no sin, and keep all
God’s commandments. It therefore directly contradicts the oral law, and
overturns the doctrine that some merits may outweigh many sins.
If more proof be needful, we have it in the case of Moses himself. Very
few, if any, even of the most devoted friends of the oral law, can
imagine that he has so many merits as Moses his master; and yet the
merits of Moses did not outweigh one apparently trifling transgression.
Because of one sin, he was sentenced to die with the disobedient
generation in the wilderness, and not permitted to enter into the land
of Israel. If Moses’ merits, then, could do nothing for him, how vain
must be the hope of others, who think that, by abounding in almsgiving
and good works for ten days, they can turn the scale of God’s righteous
judgment? Neither the law nor the prophets know of any intermediate
class between the righteous and the wicked. They specify only the two
classes, the righteous and the wicked. Those who fulfil all God’s
commandments belong to the one, and those who transgress any of God’s
commandments belong to the other. Let every man, then, examine his own
heart and life, and it will not require much time nor trouble to
ascertain to which class he belongs. A very little reflection will
convince him that he has been, and is, a transgressor of God’s
commandments; that he has no merits and no righteousness; and therefore
belongs to that class of whom Moses says, that they are accursed. Such a
conclusion may appear dreadful, and so it ought to be; but the grand
question is, Is it true? Let every man ask himself, “Have I kept, or do
I keep, ALL God’s commandments?” If he can say, Yes: then, according to
the law of Moses, he is righteous, and has the promise of life. But if
he must say, No: then he is unrighteous, and the curse of God is hanging
over him, ready to descend and destroy him:—
ארור אשר לא יקים את דברי התורה הזאת לעשות אותם ואמר כל העם אמן ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account