The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“Moreover, ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer,
which is guilty of death; but he shall surely be put to death.” (Num.
xxxv. 31.) According to this declaration, the good deeds or merits of a
murderer are not to be regarded, and there is nothing which he can do
which can avert the sentence of the law. And shall we suppose that God
himself will do what he forbids men to do? If so, why did he forbid it
to be done? The plain reason of this prohibition is, because it is
contrary to the eternal principles of right and wrong, which God himself
cannot violate without detracting from his holiness. But it is not with
respect to murder only that God has laid down these stern principles of
justice. He says generally—
והנפש אשר תעשה ביד רמה מן האזרח ומן הגר את ה׳ הוא מגדף ונכרתה הנפש ההיא
מקרב עמה , כי דבר ה׳ בזה ואת מצותו הפר הכרת תכרת הנפש ההיא עונה בה ׃
“But the soul that doeth ought presumptuously, whether he be born in the
land, or a stranger, the same reproacheth the Lord, and that soul shall
be cut off from among his people. Because he hath despised the Lord, and
hath broken his commandment, that soul shall utterly be cut off; his
iniquity shall be upon him.” (Numb. xv. 30, 31.) There is here no
promise that his merits shall be weighed against his offences. One
presumptuous sin will outweigh all his supposed merits, and for that one
he shall die in his iniquity. The doctrine of the prophets is just the
same:—
הנפש החוטאת היא תמות ׃
“The soul that sinneth it shall die.”
ובשוב צדיק מצדקתו ועשה עול ככל התועבות אשר עשה הרשע יעשה וחי כל צדקתיו
אשר עשה לא תזכרנה במעלו אשר מעל ובחטאתו אשר חטא בם ימות ׃
“But when the righteous turneth away from this righteousness, and
committeth iniquity, and doeth according to all the abominations that
the wicked man doeth, shall he live? _All his righteousness that he hath
done shall not be mentioned_: in his trespass that he hath trespassed,
and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die.” (Ezek. xviii.
20-25.) When one reads this passage, it appears as if God had dictated
it on purpose to contradict the doctrine of the oral law. There is here
no mention of weighing merits against sins, and no promise that some few
extraordinary merits may outweigh many sins. On the contrary, it is
distinctly stated, that when the righteous man turneth away from his
righteousness, “All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be
mentioned.” If this be true, the doctrine of the oral law is necessarily
and totally false. But some one may object that there is a similar
declaration made respecting the wicked:—
והרשע כי ישוב מכל חטאתיו אשר עשה ושמר את כל חקותי ועשה משפט וצדקה חיה
יחיה לא ימות , כל פשעיו אשר עשה לא יזכרו לו בצדקתו אשר עשה יחיה ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account