The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“For we do not present our supplications before thee for our
righteousnesses, but for thy great mercies.” (Dan. ix. 18.) How, then,
can the modern Jews hope to stand at the tribunal of a heart-searching
God, and not only escape condemnation, but obtain a reward because their
merits exceed their sins? Are they more pure than Job, more holy than
David, more righteous than Daniel? or were those three most holy men
mistaken, or ignorant of the way of salvation? Certain it is that there
must be some mistake somewhere. Either the rabbies were right, and then
Job, David, and Daniel were mistaken, or these three men were right, and
then the rabbies are fearfully and awfully mistaken. If the law requires
perfect obedience, and denounces a curse against all disobedience, then
the former were right in deprecating God’s judgment, and casting
themselves upon his mercy. But if the law requires only that a man’s
merits should exceed his sins, and says that all deficiencies can be
made up by almsgiving and good works in the ten days between the New
Year and the Day of Atonement, then they were wrong. Job was utterly
mistaken when he said, “How should man be just with God?” for the
rabbies say, Only be careful for the first ten days of the year, and you
will be just and sealed unto life. David was utterly mistaken when he
said, “In thy sight shall no man living be justified;” for the rabbies
say that a man’s merits may exceed his sins, and that such an one is
just before God. Daniel was mistaken in not offering his prayers on the
score of righteousness, but on the plea of mercy. But still,
notwithstanding the certainty with which the rabbies speak, we would
rather trust our own salvation to the word of Moses, of Ezekiel, of Job,
David, and Daniel, than to that of the rabbies. We would rather kneel as
supplicants, than claim the reward of our deeds with the rabbies.
But we cannot pass this subject without observing here also how the
religion of the rabbies exhibits itself at every turn as a religion for
the rich and the learned, rather than for the poor and laborious class
of mankind. It teaches that almsgiving and good works, at a certain
season of the year, will turn the wicked into righteous men, and
transform the sinner into the saint. So the rich sinner puts his hand
into his pocket, and lavishes his gold to the poor and needy, and buys
what is wanting to make up his deficit of merit. The learned man sets to
work at his books; for the oral law says:—
אין לך מצוה בכל המצוות כולן שהיא שקולה כנגד תלמוד תורה , אלא תלמוד תורה
כנגד כל המצוות כולן שהתלמוד מביא לידי מעשה לפיכך התלמוד קודם למעשה בכל
מקום ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account