The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
the movings of his compassion depend upon the blowing of a cornet? What
would Elijah have said to such doctrine as this? When the priests of
Baal only cried aloud, he mocked them, and said, “Cry aloud, for he is a
God; either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is on a journey, or
peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked.” (1 Kings xviii. 27.) And
yet the priests of Baal were not sounding a cornet, that they might
rouse their pretended Deity to compassion. If we had not read this
prayer with our own eyes, we could scarcely have believed that even
Rabbinism itself could have fallen into such manifest absurdity. But the
subject is far too grave to be treated with levity. Upon this absurdity,
the rabbies teach Israel to rest their hope of salvation. Conscious that
the hope of justification by merit is fallacious, and yet unwilling to
give up what is so palatable to the pride of man, they seek about to
find something that will compensate for the deficiency, and in the
eagerness of desperation grasp at any thing. The trivial ceremony of
blowing the cornet was therefore turned into a mystery, and a suitable
apparatus of angels invented to meet the apprehensions of the
superstitious and unenlightened, and in some degree to take off the
apparent irrationality of believing that an act so insignificant should
effect a change so great in the purposes of the Almighty. But whatever
was the motive or the origin of this fable, there it now stands in the
prayers of the synagogue, to lead the ignorant away from the true means
of justification, and the true ideas of God’s justice and God’s
judgment. Let no man say it is an innocent error. No error is innocent.
Error in every form is pernicious; in religion it is deadly. And the
most mischievous of all religious errors are those which confirm men in
the idea, that external ceremonies will atone for moral delinquencies;
and this is precisely the tendency of the fable here noticed. An
ignorant and superstitious man, and there are many such in every
religion, finds in his Prayer-book that the blowing of the cornet can
change the attribute of judgment into the attribute of mercy: he
believes it to be true, not only because of the book where he finds it,
but because every man is glad to hear of a way of acceptance, which will
save the trouble of repentance and thorough change of heart and life. He
therefore perseveres through the year in the practice of those things
which his heart condemns, trusting that the blowing of the cornet will
set all straight, and thus he goes on from year to year until death
overtakes him hardened and impenitent, and he finds too late at the bar
of God, that he has been in fatal error. Upon whom then will the guilt
of such person’s destruction be charged? Not only upon those who
invented the falsehood, but on those also who sanction it, who leave it
in the Prayer-book, and thus practically teach the people superstition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account