The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
These passages show plainly that, after all, the rabbies felt their own
doctrine of justification by merits very unsafe ground on which to build
their hope of salvation; and that they were glad to flee to merits more
adequate, which they hoped to find in the righteousness of their
ancestors. The modern Jews, who still adopt these prayers, profess to
entertain the same hope, and we therefore proceed to inquire, whether it
be built on a better foundation than that which they are compelled to
relinquish. We think that it is not; for, in the first place, the saints
of old, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, though we revere them as pious and
holy men, were after all only sinful men like ourselves. They did not,
and could not, save themselves by their own righteousness, and if they
did not save themselves, it is folly to think that they can save us.
Abraham, though by the grace of God, the father of the faithful, was yet
in himself so weak in faith, and so distrustful in the goodness and
mercy of God, as to endeavour to save himself from the Egyptians by
means of a deliberate falsehood. Sarah had so little faith as to laugh
within herself at the promise of God, and then to defend herself by a
lie. Isaac was guilty of similar conduct, and Jacob’s sin in deceiving
his brother plainly shows, that he also was a poor sinful creature.
Where then are their superabundant merits, whereby they are to justify
all their posterity? The Word of God says expressly,—
אח לא פדה יפדה איש לא יתן לאלהים כפרו ׃
“No man can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom
for him.” (Ps. xlix. 8.) How then are these three men to redeem all
their posterity? If they have got merits sufficient to compensate for
the unrighteousness of their children, then they have a ransom; and then
the Word of God, which says that no man has a ransom, is not true. But
if the words of the Psalm be true,—and he is no Jew who thinks them
false,—then the patriarchs have no superabundant merits, and no ransom
to offer for their children, and then the hope built on their
righteousness is deceitful, and those that lean on it will find
themselves mistaken in the hour of judgment. Nay, more, they will find
themselves accursed for departing from the Lord. He that trusts in the
righteousness of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, to deliver him from the
wrath to come, is evidently trusting in man, and making flesh his arm.
If the merits of the patriarchs can save their children from the wrath
of God, then God is not the Saviour of Israel, but the patriarchs are
Israel’s redeemers, and poor mortal men are their hope and their trust:
but the Prophet says,—
ארור הגבר אשר יבטח באדם ושם בשר זרועו ומן ה׳ יסור לבו ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account