The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and
whose heart departeth from the Lord.” (Jer. xvii. 5.) So far, then, from
being secure by trusting in the righteousness of Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob, this trust increases the sinner’s guilt, and draws down upon him
a double curse. But it has pleased God himself to argue this question at
large with the Jews, to suppose the case of a righteous father who has
an unrighteous son, and to declare that the son cannot be saved by the
righteousness of the father. In the Prophet Ezekiel, God says, “If a man
be just, and do that which is lawful and right—he is just, he shall
surely live, saith the Lord God. If he beget a son that is a robber, a
shedder of blood, and that doeth the like to any of these things, and
that doeth not any of those duties, but even hath eaten upon the
mountains, and defileth his neighbour’s wife, hath oppressed the poor
and needy, hath spoiled by violence, hath not restored the pledge, and
hath lifted up his eyes to the idols, hath committed abomination, hath
given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he
shall not live: he hath done all these abominations: he shall surely
die; his blood shall be upon him.” (Ezek. xviii. 5-13.) Here God sets
the matter at rest, and decides that the righteousness of a father is of
no use to an unrighteous son, and cannot deliver him from the punishment
due to his evil deeds. The doctrine, then, of justification by the
merits of ancestors, is directly opposed to the plain declaration of God
himself, and, therefore, in this case also the Jewish prayers and the
oral law teach error, and seduce the Jews to their everlasting
destruction, by teaching them to trust in that which can do them no
good. It is an awful and melancholy spectacle to see God’s ancient
people thus misled. At this season of the year, the devout amongst them
endeavour to turn to God, fast and pray, and yet neither the one nor the
other is accepted, because they put their trust in the merits of men,
and their heart is turned away from God their Saviour. The prayers of
the synagogue, instead of drawing down a blessing, only help to
accumulate wrath, by seducing them from the Redeemer of Israel to
refuges of lies. And hence it happens that all the fasts and the prayers
of Israel for these seventeen centuries have been disregarded by God,
and that Israel still continues in captivity. But as every lie and every
error is built upon some truth as its foundation, it will be well to
inquire what truth it was that gave rise to this error of justification
by the merits of ancestors? The principle is _that the guilty may be
saved by the merits of another person, who is righteous_: how, then, did
this principle become current among the Jews? It was certainly not the
invention of human reason, for reason can discover no necessary
connexion between the merits of one righteous man and the pardon of
another who is guilty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account