The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“An Israelite who kills a sojourning proselyte, is not put to death on
his account by the tribunal, for it is said, ‘But if a man come
presumptuously upon his neighbour.’ (Exodus xxi. 14.)” The law of God
says, “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for
in the image of God made he man.” (Gen. ix. 6.) And to this law the New
Testament commands us Christians to adhere, rejecting the oral
traditions; and in consequence the laws of Christian countries make no
difference between the murderer of a Jew, a Christian, Turk, Infidel, or
Heretic. Short as all Christian nations confessedly come of the pure
morality of the New Testament, their laws direct the administration of
impartial justice, and are a terror to all evil doers of every creed and
sect. The liberality of the Talmud then, in allowing a share of
salvation to the pious of the world is not so very great, nor its
toleration of a very comprehensive character. It not only withholds
justice from the pious of the world, but gives as the reason, because
they are not considered as neighbours. Want of room prevents us from
pursuing this subject further at present. We therefore ask, Is this law
from God? Can God, in an oral law, directly contradict his written law?
Can you point out anything similar in the New Testament? Is this law
just or unjust? You will grant that it is unjust and erroneous. Then
your fathers have been mistaken about one of the first principles of the
administration of justice, for many centuries. And your brethren who
adhere to this system as Divine, as on the Barbary coast, for instance,
are still mistaken. Why do you not protest aloud against such error? Why
not endeavour to convince your brethren that they are wrong? In England
there is nothing to prevent you. There is full liberty, free toleration.
You may lift up your voice like a trumpet against the errors of the
Talmud. You may expunge all acknowledgment of its authority from your
prayers—you may return to Moses and the prophets, and no man will say
nay.
Footnote 15:
Instead of לנד _alone_, there is another reading, לנד׳׳, the tribunal.
No. IX.
CHRISTIANS CANNOT BE RECKONED AMONGST THE “PIOUS OF THE NATIONS OF THE
WORLD.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account