The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“It is lawful to rend an amhaaretz like a fish;” and, a little above, an
Israelite is forbidden to marry the daughter of such a person, for that
she is no better than a beast. But the whole of the preceding passage is
so characteristic of the spirit of Rabbinism, that it is worth
inserting—
תנו רבנן וכו׳ ,
“Our Rabbies have taught. Let a man sell all that he has, and marry the
daughter of a learned man. If he cannot find the daughter of a learned
man, let him take the daughter of the great men of the time. If he
cannot find the daughter of a great man of the time, let him marry the
daughter of the head of a congregation. If he cannot find the daughter
of the head of a congregation, let him marry the daughter of an almoner.
If he cannot find the daughter of an almoner, let him marry the daughter
of a schoolmaster. But let him not marry the daughter of the unlearned,
for they are an abomination, and their wives are vermin; and of their
daughters it is said, ‘Cursed is he that lieth with any beast.’” Here,
again, one is inclined to suppose that there is a mistake, or that these
words were spoken in jest, though such a jest would be intolerably
profane; but all ground for such supposition is removed on finding this
passage transcribed into the digest of Jewish law, called the Schulchan
Aruch, part 2; in the Hilchoth P’riah ur’viah, by which transcription it
is stamped, with all the authority of a law. Here, then, the reader is
led to think, that an amhaaretz must mean something more and worse than
an unlearned man—that it ought, perhaps, to be taken in its literal
signification, “people of the land,” and that it may refer to the
idolatrous and wicked Canaanites. But the common usage of the Talmud
forbids a supposition. There is a well-known sentence which shows that
even a High Priest might be an amhaaretz:—
ממזר ת׳׳ח קודם לכהן גדול עם הארץ ,
“A learned man, though illegitimate, goes before a High Priest, who is
an amhaaretz.” Here the amhaaretz is plainly opposed to him that is
learned. And so, on the page of the Talmud from which we have quoted
above, we find the following words:—
עם הארץ אסור לאכול בשר בהמה שנאמר זאת תורת הבהמה והעוף כל העוסק בתורה
מותר לאכול בשר בהמה ועוף וכל שאינו עוסק בתורה אסור לאכול בשר בהמה ועוף ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account