When we appeal to the historians, we hear much of a remote antiquity
in the history of man: a more than twilight gloom pervades the
earlier periods; and the distances are exaggerated, as objects appear
large in a fog. We measure, too, by a minute scale. There is a tacit
reference to the threescore and ten years of human life; and its term
of a day appears long to the ephemera. We turn from the historians
to the prophets, and find the dissimilarity of style indicating a
different speaker. Ezekiel's measuring-reed is graduated into cubits
of the temple. The vast periods of the short-lived historian dwindled
down into weeks and days. Seventy weeks indicated to Daniel, in the
first year of Darius, the time of the Messiah's coming. Three years
and a half limit the term of the Mohammedan delusion. Seventeen
years have not yet gone by since Adam first arose from the mould;
nor has the race, as such, attained to the maturity of even early
manhood. But while prophecy sums up merely weeks and days, when it
refers to the past, it looks forward into the future, and speaks of
a thousand years. Are scales of unequally graduated parts ever used
in measuring different portions of the same map or section--scales so
very unequally graduated, that, while the parts in some places expand
to the natural size, they are in others more than three hundred times
diminished? If not,--for what save inextricable confusion would
result from their use,--how avoid the conclusion, that the typical
scale employed in the same book by the same prophet represents
similar quantities by corresponding parts, whether applied to times
of outrage, delusion, and calamity, or set off against that long and
happy period in which the spirit of evil shall be bound in chains
and darkness, and the kingdom of Christ shall have come? And if such
be the case--if each single year of the thousand years of the future
represents a term as extended as each single year of the seventeen
years of the past--if the present scene of things be thus merely in
its beginning--should we at all wonder to find that the formation
which represents it has laid down merely its few first strata?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account