turtle; and why, I asked, if one formation gives us sauroid fishes,
may not another give us chelonian ones? or if in the Lias we find
the body of the lizard mounted on the paddles of the whale, why not
find in the Old Red Sandstone the body of the tortoise mounted in
a somewhat similar manner? The idea originated in error; but as it
was an error which not many naturalists could have corrected at the
time, it may be deemed an excusable one, more especially by such of
my readers as may have seen well-preserved specimens of the creature,
or who examine the subjoined prints. (Nos. I. and II.) I submitted
some of my specimens to Mr. Murchison, at a time when that gentleman
was engaged among the fossils of the Silurian System, and employed
on his great work, which has so largely served to extend geological
knowledge regarding those earlier periods in which animal life first
began. He was much interested in the discovery: it furnished the
geologist with additional data by which to regulate and construct
his calculations, and added a new and very singular link to the
chain of existence in its relation to human knowledge. Deferring to
Agassiz, as the highest authority, he yet anticipated the decision
of that naturalist regarding it, in almost every particular. I had
inquired, under the influence of my first impression, whether it
might not be considered as a sort of intermediate existence between
the fish and the chelonian. He stated, in reply, that he could
not deem it referrible to any family of reptiles; that, if not a
fish, it approached more closely to the Crustacea than to any other
class; and that he had little doubt Agassiz would pronounce it to
be an ichthyolite of that ancient order to which the _Cephalaspis_
belongs, and which seems to have formed a connecting link between
crustacea and fishes.[I] The specimens submitted to Mr. Murchison
were forwarded to Agassiz. They were much more imperfect than some
which I have since disinterred; and to restore the entire animal from
them would require powers such as those possessed by Cuvier in the
past age, and by the naturalist of Neufchatel in the present. Broken
as they were, however, Agassiz at once decided from them that the
creature must have been a fish.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account