Unfortunately, when we descend to details, such palæontological
gaps present themselves that every sort of objection is possible.
The chain which morphology has allowed us to piece together is
continually snapped when we essay to travel back into the past....
The art of distinguishing realities from phantoms of the
imagination is what has made modern science so great and so mighty.
She is strong enough to win honour by avowing ignorance, and
because men see her always determined to speak the truth, they
gradually realize that she is not dangerous.
And in his Presidential address to the Linnean Society, May 24, 1902,
Professor S. H. Vines thus expressed himself as to the genealogical
table of organic life, which ever since the doctrine of Evolution was
accepted, it has been sought to construct:
Though here and there fragments of the mosaic seem to have been
successfully pieced together, the main outlines, even, of the great
picture are as yet but dimly discernible.
The fact that organic Evolution should have proceeded so far as it
has within such limits of time as may reasonably be allowed,
admits, to my mind, of no other interpretation than that variation
is not indeterminate, but, as Lamarck and Nägeli have urged, there
must exist in living matter a certain inherent tendency or bias in
favour of variation in the higher direction. It is this tendency or
bias that I venture to regard as the primordial factor.
But it is precisely such an inherent tendency of organic life to develop
on predetermined lines, which Darwinians and other advocates of
Evolution by the agency of physical forces alone, vehemently repudiate
as fatal to their whole system.
[Since Professor Williamson wrote, the opinion has been adopted
that for the very reason which induced him to place the Sharks
above the _Cycloids_ and _Ctenoids_, their relative positions
should be reversed. The Sharks being a more "generalized" type,
with features more akin to those of land-dwelling reptiles, and the
others more "specialized" for purely aquatic conditions, the
latter, it is argued, are a higher evolutionary product. As a
necessary corollary it is assumed that vertebrate life originated,
not, as had been supposed, in the sea, but in swamps or lagoons on
the shore-line. It must, however, remain a question how far the
facility with which theories can thus be modified according to
requirements, is calculated to inspire confidence in them.]
XVII
"AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM"
We have heard Mr. Carruthers' declaration, based upon his survey of
palæontological botany, "The whole evidence is against Evolution, and
there is none in favour of it."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account