Of Chance, enough has already been said. It is, however, worth our
while to observe how constantly to the last Mr. Darwin was haunted by
the consciousness that this was in reality the factor upon which his
system must depend, and that it could not possibly account for much that
he came across in nature. If, as he confessed, the sight of a peacock's
tail-feather made him sick, it was just because its elaborate beauty, to
which no commensurate advantage can be supposed to attach, forbade the
notion that his theory could account for it. So, of another still more
marvellous instance in which Nature exhibits artistic power, namely the
ball-and-socket ornament on the wings of the Argus pheasant, he
writes:[202]
No one, I presume, will attribute this shading, which has excited
the admiration of many experienced artists, to chance--to the
fortuitous concourse of atoms of colouring matter. That these
ornaments should have been formed through the selection of many
successive variations, not one of which was originally intended to
produce the ball-and-socket effect, seems as incredible as that one
of Raphael's Madonnas should have been formed by the selection of
chance daubs of paints made by a long succession of young artists,
not one of whom intended at first to draw the human figure.
[Illustration:
1. Basal portion of secondary wing-feather; nearest body, shewing first
rudiment of "ocelli."
2. Portion of secondary wing-feather near body, shewing "elliptic"
ornaments.
3. Part of secondary wing-feather, shewing developed "ocelli."
Feathers from wing of Argus Pheasant, from Darwin's _Descent of Man_.]
Nevertheless, Mr. Darwin proceeds to argue at considerable length that
an explanation consistent with his theory is favoured by the occurrence
on the same wings of designs exhibiting every stage of gradation from a
mere spot to the finished ball-and-socket _ocellus_; in the same way as
the tail feathers of a peacock advance from a mere sketch to the
completed design. It is not easy, however, to understand in what way
this is supposed to solve the difficulty and not vastly to increase it.
That a finished artistic effect should be fortuitously produced at all
would be incredible enough. That it should be worked up by Chance
through a series of processes, each doing something towards its
completion, is surely not less, but far more inconceivable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account