The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Egyptian antiquities testify to the civilization of the Egyptians, as has
already been remarked, from remote ages, and the inscriptions show that
the kingdom was well organized, and governed by rulers whose sway was
popular and in accordance with the wishes of the priesthood. This state of
things lasted, according to Prof. Flinders Petrie, until about 2098 B.C.,
when suddenly this exceedingly conservative nation, possessing as great a
dislike for foreigners as do the Chinese at the present time, found itself
attacked and invaded by barbarian hordes from Western Asia. From what
district these people came is not known. According to Josephus, they were
regarded by some as Arabians, but Josephus himself regarded them as being
of his own race, _i.e._ Jewish. Quoting from Manetho, he shows that, under
a ruler called Timaios, these people from the east, “men of an ignoble
race,” invaded the land, and easily made themselves master of it without a
battle. When the rulers of Egypt fell into their hands, they burned the
cities, destroyed the temples of the gods, and inflicted every kind of
indignity upon the inhabitants. At last they raised one of themselves
named Salatis (a name evidently derived from the Semitic root _šālaṭ_, “to
rule”) to the throne. This king made Memphis his capital, both Upper and
Lower Egypt become tributary to him, and he stationed garrisons in those
places which were most suitable for the purpose. One interesting point is,
that he directed his attention especially to the security of the eastern
frontier, because he feared the Assyrians, who, he foresaw, would one day
undertake an invasion of his kingdom. This, to all appearance, refers to
the Babylonian dominion, which, as we have seen (see pp. 124 and 155)
extended to the Mediterranean. As far as our historical knowledge extends,
his fears were groundless, as no serious attempt (and certainly no
successful attempt) to conquer Egypt was made until long after the time of
Salatis, when Esarhaddon, king of Assyria, succeeded in subjugating the
country, which remained under Assyrian overlordship until the reign of his
son Aššur-banî-âpli.
Salatis ruled 19 years, and was succeeded by a king named Beon or Bnōn,
who reigned 44 years. The next ruler of this race bears the
Egyptian-sounding name of Apakhnas, and ruled for 37 years and 7 months.
Next came Apophis, the Apepi of modern scholars, who occupied the throne
no less than 61 years, Ianias, who ruled for 50 years and 1 month, having
also a very long reign. After all these ruled Assis, 49 years and 2
months. These six, says Manetho, were the first of their rulers, and
constantly strove to exterminate the Egyptians by making war upon them.
Hyksos, or Shepherd kings, and their successors, he goes on to say,
retained possession of Egypt 511 years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account