The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Jehu’s payment of tribute to the Assyrian king in 842 B.C. was probably
due to a question of policy, and in the main it may be considered as a
cheap way of avoiding misfortune, for he might easily have been worsted in
an encounter with Shalmaneser. What Tyre and Sidon thought fit to do,
could hardly but be recognized as policy for Israel as well. It was
important for Jehu that he should consolidate his power, hence this
submission, though, to say the truth, he could not have been certain that
he would be attacked. Was it that he felt strong enough to resist the
Assyrian king which made him withhold the payment of tribute when, in 839
B.C., Shalmaneser again marched against Hazael? It would seem so. On this
occasion four towns of the king of Damascus were captured, and tribute
again received from Tyre and Sidon, Gebal likewise buying peace in the
same way.
That Jehu, who destroyed the house of Omri, should be called “son of Omri”
in the inscriptions of Shalmaneser II. of Assyria, is strange, and needs
explanation. Perhaps the successor of a king could loosely be spoken of as
his son, as occupying the place of such a relative; and, as is well known,
Belshazzar, in the book of Daniel, is called son of Nebuchadnezzar, which,
according to the Babylonian inscriptions, he certainly was not. That Jehu
may have been in some way related with Jehoram, and therefore a descendant
of Omri, is possible and even probable. That he was not descended from him
in a direct line is certain.
It is noteworthy that the Assyrian form of the name, Yaua, shows that the
unpronounced aleph at the end was at that time sounded, so that the
Hebrews must have called him Yahua (Jehua). Omri was likewise pronounced
in accordance with the older system, before the ghain became ayin. Ḫumrî
shows that they said at that time Ghomrî.
After the rebellion which embittered the closing years of Shalmaneser’s
life, the great Assyrian king died, and his crown went to his younger son
Šamši-Adad III. (825-812 B.C.). The first work of the new ruler was the
pacification of his country, and this having been successfully done, he
tried to restore Assyrian influence beyond the borders of his kingdom.
During his reign of about thirteen years, he warred on the N., N.E., N.W.
and S. (Babylonia), but never came nearer to Syria than Kar-Shalmaneser on
the Euphrates, near Carchemish.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account