The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
After this there is a gap until the sixth year of his reign, the entry for
which, however, refers wholly to Astyages’ operations against Cyrus, and
its disastrous results, for he was made prisoner, Ecbatana sacked, and the
spoil brought to Anšan, Cyrus’s capital.
Previous to this, as Nabonidus informs us in his cylinder-inscription
found by Mr. Rassam at Abu-habbah (Sippar), the Medes had been very
successful in their warlike operations, and had even besieged Haran,
making it impossible for Nabonidus to carry out the instructions of his
god Merodach, revealed to him in a dream, to restore the temple of Sin in
that city. On the king of Babylon reminding the deity of the state of
things in that part, and speaking of the strength of the Median forces, he
was told that in three years’ time their power would be destroyed, which
happened as predicted. He now caused his “vast army” to come from Gaza and
elsewhere to do the needful work, and when completed, the image of the god
Sin was brought from Babylon, and placed in the restored shrine with joy
and shouting. Naturally the Babylonian king was overjoyed at the release
of Haran from the power of the Medes—could he have foreseen that Cyrus,
their conqueror, would one day hurl him from his throne, his enthusiasm
concerning the success of “the young servant of Merodach” (as he calls
him) would have been greatly abated.
In his seventh and eighth years the king was in Temâ, and the crown prince
(apparently Belshazzar is meant), with the great men and the army, was in
Akkad (the northern part of Babylonia, of which the city of Agad or Agadé
was the capital). The king did not go to Babylon, Nebo did not go to
Babylon, Bel did not go forth, the festival _akitu_ (new year’s festival)
was not performed, though the victims seem to have been offered in
Ê-sagila and Ê-zida as usual, and (the king) appointed a priest
(_uru-gala_) of the weapon (?) and the temple. In the ninth year also the
same state of things existed, and this year the mother of the king died,
to the great grief of the people. It is also recorded for this year that
Cyrus, apparently in the course of one of his military expeditions,
crossed the Tigris above Arbela.
From the fact that the religious processions and ceremonies are given as
being unperformed every year from the seventh to the eleventh of his
reign, it is clear that a great deal of discontent was caused thereby, as
is, in fact, indicated by the cylinder-inscription of Cyrus detailing
under what conditions he himself entered Babylon. It was evidently one of
the duties of the Babylonian kings (and, as we have seen, the Assyrian
kings conformed to this when they became kings of Babylonia) to perform
the usual ceremonies, and the ruler neglecting this was certain to fall
into disfavour with the priesthood, and, by their influence, with the
people as well.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account