The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Naturally, in a case of doubt, the seeker after truth in the matter of
Babylonian history consults the record of the Babylonian historian
Berosus. In the case of the taking of Babylon, however, there are such
noteworthy differences, that one may well be excused for doubting his
statements, notwithstanding his trustworthiness in other matters. He says
that when Nabonnedus saw that Cyrus was coming to attack him, he met him
with his forces, was beaten, and fled with a few of his troops to
Borsippa. Cyrus then took Babylon, and gave order that the outer walls
should be demolished, the city having proved very troublesome to him, and
cost him much pains to capture. He then proceeded to besiege Nabonnedus in
Borsippa, but the Babylonian king decided not to attempt to resist, and
yielded. Cyrus therefore treated him kindly, and though he would not allow
him to remain in Babylonia, he gave him Carmania as a place where he might
dwell. “Accordingly Nabonnedus spent the rest of his time in that country,
and there died.”
The Babylonian Chronicle, however, says nothing about Nabonidus having
taken refuge in Borsippa, nor of his being besieged there, nor of his
having submitted at that place. On the contrary, he was taken in Babylon,
which city had been captured without fighting, and there was on that
account no immediate excuse for demolishing the walls, which, as native
records tell us, were dismantled in the time of the Seleucidæ. The fact
is, Berosus did not wish it to be thought that the Babylonians had allowed
their country to pass into the hands of a foreign ruler without
resistance, hence this statement as to the capital holding out. To all
appearance, Berosus is truthful where it is not to his interest to be
otherwise.
The probability is, therefore, that “the son of the king,” Belshazzar,
held out against the Persians in some part of the capital, and kept during
that time a festival on the 11th of Marcheswan, when Gobryas pounced upon
the place, and he, the rightful Chaldean king, was slain, as recorded in
Daniel. In this case, Darius the Mede ought to be “Gobryas of Gutium,”
who, like the former, appointed governors in Babylonia, and “received the
kingdom” for Cyrus. If this be the case, Daniel would seem to have been in
Belshazzar’s power, though his knowledge of what was going on on the
Persian side gave him courage to reject that prince’s favours with scorn.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account