The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
“As they journeyed in the east” apparently refers to the remembrance of
the migrations that many a nation, handing down its traditions from mouth
to mouth, must have preserved in ancient times. Whilst thus engaged, “they
found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there”—a statement
which would seem to point to the migrants having been wandering about in
various districts, some of them mountainous—like Armenia on the north of
Assyria, and Elam and other mountainous tracts on the east. This would
seem to agree with the migration which, from the evidence of the monuments
of Babylonia, the Akkadians apparently made before they settled in that
country. And here it may be noted, in support of that fact, that the
ideograph(14) for Akkad, Uri or Ura in Akkadian, and Akkadū in Semitic
Babylonian, not only stood for Akkad, but also (often used in the Assyrian
letters) for Ararat (Urṭū), and likewise (this in a syllabary only) for
Amurrū, the land of the Amorites, or Phœnicia. Both these being districts
more or less mountainous, it is only reasonable to suppose that the
original home of the Akkadians was likewise of the same nature, and that
they were not aborigines of the Babylonian plain. The Akkadians at least,
therefore, “journeyed in the east.”
In the expression “they found a plain in the land of Shinar,” we have a
reference to the old name of a district of Babylonia, generally regarded
as the Šumer of the Babylonian inscriptions, called Kingi or Kengi “the
country” _par excellence_ in the native tongue of the inhabitants. The
land of Shinar here spoken of, if this explanation be correct, not merely
contained a plain—it was, in fact, itself a large plain, through which the
rivers Tigris and Euphrates ran, and it was covered, when the land had
been brought into a really good state of cultivation, by a network of
canals connected with them. It must, when the ancient Akkadians first
settled there, have been a land of remarkable fertility, and would be so
still were it brought into the same efficient state of cultivation, with
irrigation and drainage, such as the old inhabitants effected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account