The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Here, having settled down, they built a city and a tower, using brick for
stone, and bitumen for mortar—just as they are proved to have done from
the remains of cities found in the country at the present day. That
Babylon was the site of the first settlement of the nature of a city is
conceivable, and it is very possible that the first tower in Babylonia,
which in later times had many towers, as had also Assyria, was situated in
that ancient city. Everything points, therefore, to the correctness of the
statements made in this portion of the sacred narrative. According to
native tradition, however (and this seems to be supported by the
statements in ch. x. 10), there were other important cities on the
Babylonian plain of almost equal antiquity, namely, Erech, Akkad, and
Calneh, which last is identified with Niffer (see p. 126). Notwithstanding
the extensive ruins, proof of the same remote date for Babylon will
doubtless be difficult to obtain, on account of the country around and a
large portion of the site of the city being so marshy. The result of this
condition of things will in all probability be, that very few remains of a
really ancient date will be discovered in a condition to render services
to archæology. To this must also be added the fact, that the city, being
the capital for some thousands of years, underwent many changes at the
hands of its various kings, partly from the necessity of keeping in good
repair the many comparatively perishable brick monuments that the city
contained, and partly from a desire to add more to the glories of the city
than any of their predecessors had done.
“And they said, Come, let us build us a city, and a tower, and its top
(lit. head) shall be in the heavens.” To all appearance, this means simply
that they would build a very high structure,—to many a student of the
sacred text it has seemed that the writer only intended to say, that the
tower (_migdol_) that they were about to build was to be very high. The
mountains of Elam were not so very far off, and travellers from that part
would have been able to assure them that the heavens would not be
appreciably nearer on account of their being a few hundred cubits above
the surface of the earth, even if traditions of their fathers’ wanderings
had not assured them of the same thing. They wished simply to make them a
name and a rallying-point, “lest,” as the sacred text has it, “we be
scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.”
And here a few remarks upon the temple-towers of the Babylonians might not
be out of place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account