The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper CorrespondentBriggs, Emily Edson
History
The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper Correspondent
Briggs, Emily Edson
United States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1933; Washington (D.C.) -- History
After Mrs. Woodhull had finished her memorial, Miss Susan B. Anthony
took the floor and told the committee that she had hurried as fast as
railroad and speed would allow her from Kansas, last winter, at this
time, in order to get a petition before this body, but after all she
was glad that Wall Street had spoken.
Mrs. Beecher Hooker now arose and said that after the subject had
been presented to her in this light she had immediately written to
Myra Bradwell, who was practicing law in Chicago, for a judicial
opinion. She had also invited Mrs. Bradwell to come to this
convention and plead the case. Mrs. Bradwell declined on the plea of
ill-health, but at the same time she sent a written opinion of the
judge of the Superior Court and had presented this to Mr. Riddle, one
of the ablest lawyers in the country, and, at her request, Mr. Riddle
would now address the committee.
Mr. Riddle arose and said he meant to say nothing save what would
bear upon the case; however, he meant to say strongly what he
intensely felt, and whoever would take the pains to examine the
Constitution which he held in his hands would not attempt to gainsay
the facts contained therein. The right of suffrage is a natural
right. The right of self-government pertains to all alike, the right
to be exercised as all other rights. The right to dress is a natural
right, and the right to consume food no matter how artificially
prepared is another. What was necessary to bring the negro race
to the enjoyment of their natural rights? It was simply to remove
obstructions. Legislation can regulate the franchise but not prohibit
it. Those who were content for women to vote must do it in one of two
ways--either get rid of the word “male” or define the meaning of
citizenship. A gifted woman has just given us an argument that can
not be refuted. This change has been wrought by an amendment to the
Constitution.
The speaker was interrupted by Mr. Cook, of Illinois, asking: “What
clause of the Constitution would give us the right to allow Mrs.
Woodhull the exercise of suffrage in New York?”
Mr. Riddle replied: “All persons who live under the Constitution are
citizens of the United States; those who framed it meant citizenship.
We have no half citizens.”
Mrs. Hooker arose and said this term “citizen” had not been fully
defined.
Mr. Riddle proceeded to say: “If you look into the dictionaries,
you will find it means an inhabitant of a city who is allowed the
enjoyment of political rights. The fourteenth amendment claims that
all born within the jurisdiction of the United States are citizens,
and it also says no State shall make laws to abridge the privileges
of citizenship. What does privilege or immunity mean? It means that
New York shall not do anything to abridge the privileges.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account