“There is certainly something admirable,” replied Monsieur Roman. “Had
he only withdrawn the art of government from the clouds of metaphysics
to lead it back to reality, he should have all my praise. His party,
you say, was one of opportunism and expediency. But to excel in human
affairs what needs one but to seize the happy moment and have recourse
to utilitarian methods? This is what he did, or, at least, this is what
he would have done, if the chicken-hearted instability of his friends
and the false effrontery of his foes had left him any peace. But he
wore himself out in the vain endeavour to placate the latter and steady
the former. Time and men, those necessary tools, both were wanting to
establish his beneficent rule. At least he framed admirable plans for
home politics. And you ought not to forget that he endowed his country
with vast and fertile possessions abroad. We owe him all the more
gratitude in that he made these successful conquests alone and in spite
of the parliament from which he drew his powers.”
“Monsieur,” answered my good master, “he showed energy and skill in
colonial affairs, but not perhaps much more than a plain man displays
in buying a piece of land. And what is not to my taste in all these
over-sea affairs is the way the Europeans deal with the peoples of
Africa and America. White men, when they come to grips with black and
yellow races find themselves forced to exterminate them. One can only
conquer the savage by a higher form of barbarity. Here is the extreme
to which all foreign enterprises tend. I am not denying that the
Spaniards, the Dutch, and the English have drawn profit from them.
But, ordinarily speaking, they launch themselves haphazard, and quite
recklessly on these big and cruel undertakings.
“What is the wisdom and the will of one man in enterprises affecting
commerce, agriculture, and navigation, which necessarily depend on
an immense number of units? The part played by a statesman in such
affairs is a very small one, and if it seems marked to us it is because
our minds, turning to mythology, too willingly give a name and a
personality to all the secret workings of nature.
“What did he discover in the matter of colonisation that was not
already known to the Phœnicians in the time of Cadmus?”
At these words Monsieur Roman let fall his atlas, which the bookseller
quietly picked up.
“I discover to my sorrow, Monsieur l’Abbé,” said he, “that you are
a sophist. For that he must be who can thus smother the colonial
enterprises of the dead and gone minister with Cadmus and the
Phœnicians. You are unable to deny that these undertakings were his
work and you have made this pitiable introduction of Cadmus to set us
at loggerheads.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account